If you don't reply to the leadership information in time, will it delay your work?

Someone asked, what should I do if I don't reply to the leadership information in time and delay my work?

In fact, you may have confused the concept that "second reply" is not equal to "timely reply".

Some people think that it is a timely reply when the leader sends you a message, but this is not the case.

Without undue delay, a reply after fully understanding the information is called a timely reply, which is not necessarily an answer or "receipt" like completing the task.

Your reply can be: received+I will finish it as soon as possible; Or: received+I will give you the plan in xx or so.

If you don't fully understand the information, you can reply more: Yes, but I still don't understand xxx.

Timely reply is a timely and effective reply, not a quick and useless reply.

In addition, when we reply to the leadership information, we should also respond according to the priorities of things.

For example, in urgent tasks at work, we should speed up our response and give more feedback, because we need to ask for instructions from leaders in time to prevent mistakes and omissions. This is a sign of being responsible for your work.

If leading colleagues gossip in the group, there is no need to go back and chat for a while, otherwise it will appear that you are idle and gossip, which will increase the workload.

In short, the more important and relevant things are, the more we should start in time; What about the rest, even if the leader speaks?

draw

Sometimes the second feedback is necessary, which is reasonable when you need to establish contact with customers and leaders.

Sometimes the second reaction is a requirement. When your leader needs the so-called respect and sense of form, there is a problem.

Sometimes the secondary echo is an atmosphere, and when you are in a "secondary echo" environment, it may not be so necessary.

If your leader always asks you to reply to information every second, or your work is special and needs strong docking; Either your leader pays more attention to the so-called respect or form than efficiency, which is a bit of a waste of time.

Looks like you're free.

In fact, many people will actively reply even if they are not asked, especially newcomers, such as my cousin mentioned earlier.

In fact, it is understandable that when you come to a new environment, you will definitely want to look positive and leave a good impression on your leading colleagues, but sometimes it really backfires. ...

Take our company as an example. As we all know, we are the editorial department of Guagua, so we occasionally gossip in the group (cough and cough work needs). For example, our supervisor asked a question in the group yesterday: Li Ning has a hot search, so you can pay attention to it when you have time.

Everyone will talk in the group when they see it, but if someone reacts first every time, everyone may think: Is he very free? Why do you have to eat melons without him every time?

You think the leader likes your flexibility, but in fact. ...

It seems that you are joking.

In the eyes of leaders, many small things actually reflect a person's overall attitude, and "replying to messages" is one of them.

So what attitude does the "second reaction" represent? Let's look at it from the perspective of the information receiver.

Tell me about my personal experience. Once the leader arranged a job for me, and I answered in seconds, but he said, "Have you finished reading that long news?" This is very important. Don't fool me.