Is it a returnee from a low-risk provincial capital to a low-risk county across provinces?

Going back and forth in a low-risk place should not be so strict. Maybe you can observe it at home for a few days. Originally, both places were low-risk, and migrant workers wanted to go back to their parents' homes for a year.

Should not belong to returnees, I hope the country can correct me!

According to National Health Commission's explanation, returning from a low-risk provincial capital to a low-risk county belongs to returnees!

On October 20, 200211,the National Health and Wellness Commission issued the Notice on Printing and Distributing the Work Plan for Epidemic Prevention and Control in Rural Areas of COVID-19 in Winter and Spring, proposing that returnees should return to China with valid negative results of COVID-19 nucleic acid test within 7 days, and carry out home health monitoring for 14 days after returning home, during which they will not gather or flow, every 7 days.

Why should we strengthen epidemic prevention and control management for returnees? Who are the returnees mentioned in the work plan? Do you need to be quarantined after returning home? On the evening of the 20th, the National Health and Wellness Commission gave an authoritative answer to questions of public concern.

First, why should we strengthen the management of epidemic prevention and control of returnees?

Since the beginning of winter, sporadic cases and local cluster epidemics in rural areas have increased significantly, which has seriously affected the normal production and living order in the local area. The ability of prevention and control in rural areas is weak, and it is difficult to prevent and control the epidemic. Especially during the peak period in Spring Festival travel rush, the number of returnees has increased significantly, which will further increase the risk of epidemic spread. In order to strictly implement the prevention and control strategy of internal defense rebound, it is necessary to strengthen the management of epidemic prevention and control of returned personnel. Nucleic acid detection is an effective means to find infected people as soon as possible in COVID-19. Requiring returnees to hold negative certificates of nucleic acid testing can effectively reduce the risk of epidemic spread to rural areas and ensure that everyone has a healthy and safe Spring Festival.

2. Who are the returnees mentioned in the work plan?

The returnees mentioned in the work plan refer to those who return to the countryside from other places, mainly including:

3. How to get a negative certificate of nucleic acid test before returning to China?

Returnees can be tested in any medical institution, disease control institution or third-party testing institution with nucleic acid testing qualification at the place of departure or destination, and return to the countryside with a negative certificate of nucleic acid testing within 7 days or a health code "green code" containing negative information of nucleic acid testing within 7 days.

4. Who is responsible for checking the negative certificate of nucleic acid test?

Returnees should inform the local village committee before returning to China. After returning home, the village Committee will check the negative certificate of nucleic acid test within 7 days or the health pass code "green code" containing negative information of nucleic acid test within 7 days.

5. When did you start to return to China with the negative certificate of nucleic acid test?

Carrying the negative certificate of nucleic acid test back to China, from the peak of Spring Festival travel rush on October 28th to the peak of Spring Festival travel rush on March 8th, 65438/kloc-0.

6. Does the negative certificate of nucleic acid test need to be isolated after returning to China?

There is no need for isolation after returning to China with a negative nucleic acid test certificate, but it is necessary to carry out home health monitoring for 14 days, do a good job in monitoring body temperature and symptoms, do personal protection when going out unnecessarily, and do a nucleic acid test on the seventh day and 14 days after returning to China. If the return time is less than 14 days, the requirements of home health monitoring and nucleic acid detection shall be implemented according to the actual return time.

Seven, how to implement this policy?

All localities should determine the scope of rural areas according to local conditions and national policies, formulate detailed rules for the implementation of this province, and do a good job in related supporting services.

The so-called return home refers to migrant workers. It doesn't matter much whether employees return to China or not. Where do they work there? At most, their parents are in the countryside. After the epidemic, the unit will also consider taking a holiday. Migrant workers work hard on the construction site all the year round, and they will be reunited with their families with peace of mind during the New Year. If the risk in other provinces is low, they should be allowed to go back and reunite with their families. Don't limit it so much.

Even if the latest notice is inter-provincial. It takes 7 days to have the nucleic acid test report, but now go to the nucleic acid test site, and you will find that the site is comparable to Spring Festival travel rush's robbing the station. Such a small space, dense crowd, low risk of infection? Does the tester test whether a person replaces the armrest cover? Do not change or increase the risk of infection? Open your mouth to take samples, and the spit produced by the previous person is inhaled perfectly. Moreover, the recent notice of the Health and Health Commission is that it feels that the responsibility should be clarified first, and the prevention and control should be across the board, not meticulous, not specific, and not distinguishing people. What about those who are vaccinated at low risk? Isn't the vaccine useless?

At present, not to mention cross-province, cross-regional low-risk, cross-province low-risk, are all across the board.

According to the relevant regulations on epidemic prevention and control recently published on the Internet by cities at all levels in China,

It is generally believed that as long as people who work across provinces or outside the province want to go back to their original place of residence during the Spring Festival, or maybe they want to go back to their hometown to visit their parents, children and relatives during the Spring Festival, this should be beyond reproach!

But at present, there is a problem that ordinary people don't understand: they have not left the province where they were born, but they have not worked in the place where they registered, or in the city or county-level city where their parents and children are located. During the Spring Festival, such people move around the province and go home to visit their parents, wives, children and relatives. Is this group also within the scope of returning home?

Moreover, the city where I work and live belongs to a low-risk area, and there is no epidemic. The city where my parents, wife and children live also belongs to this province, and it is also a low-risk area without epidemic. In this case, is it necessary to do a negative nucleic acid test within 7 days for such a person who goes home?

In fact, this kind of person is really not easy. Although they all work in the same province where their parents, wives and children were born (just not in the same urban area), except for holidays, they have no chance to visit their parents, wives and children and have no time to reunite with their loved ones because of work!

In order to meet the needs of epidemic prevention and control, during the upcoming Spring Festival this year, all provinces and cities in China have introduced relevant measures, systems and regulations for epidemic prevention and control. In some places, the areas without epidemic in the same province are all low-risk urban areas, and the flow of people between the two cities is also included in the epidemic prevention and control target, and it is also required to have a negative certificate of nucleic acid test within 7 days! This kind of treatment, many people feel incredible!

Although epidemic prevention and control is an urgent task for the whole world and China, the people of the whole country should, under the wise leadership of the CPC Central Committee, strictly abide by the relevant laws and regulations of the party and the state on epidemic prevention and control, as well as the institutional measures of local governments on epidemic prevention and control, and swear to win this people's epidemic prevention and control war.

However, we should also maintain a good attitude, bravely face the current global epidemic of coronavirus, and never be intimidated by the epidemic! On the premise of ensuring epidemic prevention and control, we still have to carry out normal production and life! Everybody right?

As long as you leave your hometown, you are returning home, and you are transferred to another low-risk area in a low-risk area. As long as you have a health code, you should not be isolated at home 14 days, at most one week. This one-size-fits-all approach is a bit excessive. As long as we pay attention to self-protection measures, nucleic acid testing is necessary. It is the responsibility of every citizen to respond to the call of the country, but it is really not easy for migrant workers to return home!

The National Health and Family Planning Commission defines returnees as those who return to rural areas from other places, mainly including:

Cross-provincial returnees, returnees from cities where high-risk areas are located in the province (employees in high-risk areas do not flow in principle), employees who import cold-chain food in the province, employees who directly contact imported goods at ports, employees in isolated places, and transportation personnel.

Without looking at the explanation behind, do you think that "people return to the countryside from other places" is not rigorous enough? In fact, the "hometown" in "returnees" should refer to hometown, not rural areas. As long as it is from other places (across provinces and cities? ) Returnees are all returnees. In addition to "Hui", there is also "Lai". Anyone from other provinces should be treated equally with Hui.

Does it count as returning from the low-risk area to the low-risk area? This depends on how to say "the internal personnel in the middle and high risk areas do not flow in principle". China's language and culture are profound, but anyone who sees "principles" usually has no principles. So it is safe to go back from the low-risk area unless you fly back with wings. Because the car you are riding can't guarantee that there is no one in the middle and high-risk area. If the car carries the virus, can you guarantee that there is no dead angle for testing or disinfection?

COVID-19 can't be seen or touched. It may be everywhere. For a whole year, it has taught the world a lesson. The people of China are wise and abide by the rules. We study better than any other country in the world. We don't want to "in principle". No flow means no flow. If it is detected, it will be quarantined.

COVID-19 is a short-lived ghost, and its survival time is quite limited. As long as we leave it alone, it will soon disappear.

Last year was a sinful year, and this year is better, but I still dare not indulge as in previous years. You can't stay away from your relatives, you can't invite people to eat, and you are still committing crimes. China people attach great importance to China New Year. We have had an unprecedented evil year, which is coming and doomed to be difficult. Therefore, we would rather spend this year making mistakes-stick to celebrating the New Year on the spot, let the virus die, and strive for a hot year next year!

A one-size-fits-all approach should not be advocated. No matter where you go back to your hometown, you should do a good job in epidemic prevention and control measures, but it should not be too rigid and not cause trouble to people. The national health commission should classify; 1, from low-risk or no-risk area to low-risk area, showing seven-day health code; 2, high school dangerous area to low risk area, the nucleic acid test results within seven days (but to ensure that no contact with other suspected personnel within seven days); 3, low risk area to high school risk area, should be discouraged, otherwise, according to the high school risk area control measures when returning, this is the correct way. At present, there are more people doing nucleic acid testing in hospitals than in railway stations, and they are more susceptible to infection. Is it safe? what do you think?