Received a pre-litigation notification message from a financial company.

Legal analysis: Pre-litigation notice, that is, an ultimatum issued by either the court or your debtor (the loan company or the person who lent you money), tells you that if you don't pay back the money, they will sue the court and all the consequences will be borne by you. If you do borrow money, and it is a regular company, I advise you to find a way to pay it back. If you don't borrow money, ignore it. It may be fraudulent information.

Legal basis: People's Republic of China (PRC) Civil Procedure Law.

Article 101 If an interested party fails to apply for preservation immediately due to an emergency, which will cause irreparable damage to his legitimate rights and interests, he may apply to the people's court where the property to be preserved is located, where the respondent has his domicile or has jurisdiction for preservation measures before bringing a lawsuit or applying for arbitration. The applicant shall provide a guarantee. If no guarantee is provided, the application will be rejected. After accepting the application, the people's court must make a ruling within 48 hours; Those ordered to take protective measures shall be executed immediately. If the applicant fails to bring a lawsuit or apply for arbitration according to law within 30 days after the people's court takes the preservation measures, the people's court shall lift the preservation.

Article 102 Preservation is limited to the scope of the claim or the property related to this case.

Article 103 Property preservation shall be sealed up, detained, frozen or other methods prescribed by law. After the people's court has preserved the property, it shall immediately notify the person whose property has been preserved. Property that has been sealed up or frozen shall not be sealed up or frozen again.

Article 104 In a property dispute case, if the respondent provides a guarantee, the people's court shall make a ruling to cancel the preservation.

Article 105 If the application is wrong, the applicant shall compensate the respondent for the losses suffered due to preservation.