Do Alibaba and Tencent have the strength to compete with state-owned enterprises?

Generally speaking, under the same conditions, the competitiveness of private enterprises is stronger than that of state-owned enterprises and central enterprises. Regardless of any industry, as long as the industry allows private capital to enter and the policy does not interfere with private capital. Just be more restrictive.

UnionPay is a mobile payment tool launched by UnionPay. UnionPay is an entity initiated and established by the People's Bank of China and state-owned banks in various countries. Cloud QuickPass has been launched for many years, but it has never been able to compare with Paybook. Many people have not even heard of the name Cloud QuickPass so far, which explains the problem.

Although Alipay has a first-mover advantage and has occupied most of the mobile payment market first, Cloud QuickPass is also making continuous efforts and attracting everyone to use it through subsidies. But often people use Cloud QuickPass when collecting wool, and then never use it or even uninstall it directly, but the habit of using Paynote has not changed.

The SMS services of the three major operators were originally the main channel for communication, but now almost no one sends text messages. At the same time, fewer and fewer people are making phone calls, and voice chatting on WeChat has become mainstream.

In fact, China Mobile launched a product similar to WeChat very early, called Fetion, which can also send messages for free and is one of WeChat’s competitors. The popularity of Fetion is even earlier than WeChat. But things were different when Tencent launched WeChat.

Fetion is completely uncompetitive and has now disappeared from people’s sight.

The reason why private enterprises can be more competitive than state-owned enterprises under the same conditions is determined by institutional mechanisms.

When a state-owned enterprise decides to undertake a certain project, it requires layer upon layer of approval, and even some larger projects have to be submitted to the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission for approval. This will undoubtedly lead to missed opportunities and take too long to make decisions. The shopping mall is like a battlefield, and many opportunities are fleeting. Sometimes after applying for approval at all levels, the opportunity has been missed, or other companies have taken the lead, and have fallen behind in the competition.

The decision-making efficiency of private enterprises is obviously higher. Although large private enterprises also need layers of approval, when there are really important decisions, they can often "implement special procedures at special times."

On the other hand, state-owned enterprises have more things to consider. In addition to making money, state-owned enterprises also assume the responsibility of providing social employment and other social responsibilities. Therefore, you should not be too "violent" when making decisions, so as not to cause an adverse situation to society. Private enterprises are different. The purpose of establishing a business is to make money. As long as it doesn't break the law, you can make money faster and better, no matter how you do it, you don't have to worry too much.

The social economy needs state-owned enterprises to undertake industries that involve people's livelihood. Some industries even make little money and still lose money, but these industries require enterprises to enter. At the same time, state-owned enterprises can create a large number of jobs, and some enterprises actually exist to provide employment opportunities for ordinary people. These are industries that private enterprises cannot afford and are unwilling to enter.

Because not only do you have great responsibilities, but you also don’t make much money.

Therefore, the competitiveness of Alibaba and Tencent is very strong, but this does not mean that state-owned enterprises are not needed. Imagine if private enterprises also provided water, electricity, and coal, and the charges were increased in pursuit of higher efficiency. Would you be willing?

As long as Alibaba is still good and Tencent is okay, just look at the banks and you will know. If the state had not taken action, the prospects of the banking industry would be worrying. Netizens should not keep criticizing Alipay as a usurious loan. Just look at the banks’ credit loan interest rates. Alipay is good, but banks look at credit scores, and Jack Ma looks at Zhima Credit Score. You can take a closer look at it. Why do no business people complain about Alipay loan sharks?

This is the wrong question. Without the protection of policies, all central enterprises may go bankrupt or be merged.

What you are asking is wrong. You should ask whether state-owned enterprises and central enterprises can compete with Alibaba and Tencent without policy protection.

In the same business environment, I am afraid that state-owned enterprises and central enterprises cannot compete with Alibaba. and Tencent. Although it is very regrettable, it is true!

"When a whale falls, all things come into being", this sentence can explain all Chinese Internet monopolies that are not state-owned enterprises. strength! Instead of monopolizing the market and squeezing the people through technical means such as algorithms and traffic, we should take the initiative to shoulder the important task of strengthening the country through science and technology, taking what we have from the country and giving it back to the people.

Enterprises should regard technological innovation as the basic bottom line and development driving force. [Slap in the face][Angry][Slap in the face][Angry][Slap in the face][Angry][Slap in the face][Angry][Slap in the face]

State-owned enterprises? Haha

That’s the wrong question