What is Yu Wenhua's intentional homicide?

Defendant Yu Wenhua did not raise any objection to the criminal facts accused by the public prosecution agency. If an incidental civil action is said to be indefensible, the court shall make a judgment according to law.

It was found through trial that on the evening of 2011010, the defendant had an emotional entanglement with the victim Xiao Mouyi, and after making the victim Xiao Mouyi reconciled with him several times, he prepared art knives and other crime tools to kill him, and then used them in the workshop of Dayi Jingyuan Computer Co., Ltd., Yushan Town, Changshu City. After forensic identification, the victim Xiao Mouyi's injury has constituted a minor human injury, and the victim's injury has constituted a serious human injury.

On the night of the crime, the defendant Yu Wenhua took the initiative to call the police and truthfully confessed his main criminal facts.

During the trial, the defendant had no objection to the above facts, including the statement and identification record of the victim, the statement record of the victim Xiao Mouyi, the testimony and identification record of the witnesses Chen Moujia, Xue Mou, Liao Mou, Wang Mou, B Mou, Dong Mou and Xiao Moujia, and the testimony of the witnesses Tian Mou, Huang Mou, Li Mou and Cheng Mou. Changshu Public Security Bureau's forensic identification of human body injury, Changshu Public Security Bureau's forensic material evidence identification, short message screenshots, arrest process, case detection process, police work registration form, case acceptance registration form, household registration certificate, population information and other evidence confirmed that it is sufficient to identify.

It was also found that the victim * * * was hospitalized in the Second People's Hospital of Changshu immediately after being injured, and was diagnosed with a knife wound on the nose and face and a broken nose bone. He was discharged from the hospital on 2014118, and * * * spent 3,367.48 yuan on medical expenses (including the ambulance visit fee in 60 yuan). Before the incident, the victim * * * was an employee of Changshu Jingyuan Computer Co., Ltd.

During the trial, our hospital consulted our forensic doctor about the lost time, nursing expenses and nutrition expenses demanded by the victims. The forensic doctor thinks that the victim * * * * claims that the time limit for missing work is 2 months after the injury and the time limit for supplementing nutrition is 30 days after the injury. It is reasonable that one person can take care of him within 2 weeks after the injury, combined with his medical treatment and compared with relevant evaluation standards.

During the trial, the victim * * * asked the defendant Yu Wenhua to compensate for medical expenses of 3,427.48 yuan (including the first-aid fare 60 yuan paid for the victim Xiao Mouyi), nutrition expenses 1500 yuan, hospital food allowance 350 yuan, nursing expenses of 3,700 yuan, lost time expenses of 585 1.8 yuan, and transportation expenses 106 yuan. The loss of mental consolation money 10000 yuan, and the loss of follow-up treatment fee 10000 yuan * * is RMB 3516/.98 yuan. Defendant Yu Wenhua thinks that he is unable to pay compensation, and the court will make a judgment according to law. The victim * * * and the defendant Yu Wenhua have no objection to our expert opinion.

The above facts are confirmed by medical expense invoices, medical records, discharge records, transportation invoices, employee payrolls, current account transaction details, forensic consultation transcripts and other evidence, which is enough to be identified.