Is Zhenhua Law Firm true?

legal advice

1, you can directly check whether to file a lawsuit and why to file a lawsuit.

Check it carefully. Well, sometimes entrusted by the parties concerned, letters will be sent to the debtor or the person responsible for infringement for dunning. Such notices and letters can be written or electronic, and short messages belong to electronic letters, so they may be letters and short messages sent by legal personnel. You can contact the senders and check their existence and nature. If not, it is recommended to report to the police.

legal ground

Article 266 Whoever defrauds public or private property in a relatively large amount shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance, and shall also or solely be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than 10 years, and shall also be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment, and shall also be fined or confiscated. Where there are other provisions in this Law, such provisions shall prevail.

Appellant Z, who had a patent ownership dispute with appellee Shanghai Anqing Medical Devices Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Anqing Company), refused to accept the civil ruling of Shanghai Intellectual Property Court (2019) No.222, Zhiminchu No.73, and appealed to our court.

Z appealed to cancel the original ruling and transferred the case to the Intermediate People's Court of Xiamen City, Fujian Province for trial. Facts and reasons: Shanghai was originally judged as Z's habitual residence, but the certificate stamped by the community service center of Niumasi Mining Area in Shaodong County, Hunan Province on May 38, 20 19 (signed by the neighborhood committee of Niumasi Coal Mine in Shaodong County) records that "Ms. S and Mr. Z have been married since 20 18, indicating that Z did not live in Shanghai continuously at the time of prosecution 1 year or more. Z The dispute over patent ownership was transferred to Xiamen Intermediate People's Court of Fujian Province for trial.

An Qing Company replied that, first, Article 6 of the Measures for the Administration of Residence Permits in Shanghai stipulates that the residence permit in Shanghai has the function of "proving that the holder of residence permit lives in this city", and the certificate issued by Hua Mu Police Station of Pudong Branch of Shanghai Public Security Bureau can prove that Z's habitual residence is Shanghai; Second, the "Certificate" submitted by Z is inconsistent with the seal unit and the signature unit, so it is impossible to confirm the authenticity and legality of the evidence; Third, the appeal address of this case is Z's residence in Shanghai. Z successfully received the materials and entrusted the relevant legal personnel in Shanghai to represent the case, which was more convenient for Z to hear in the court of first instance.