What are the forensic skills of recorded evidence?

1, the choice of recording time and place From the point of view of litigation, the recording should be carried out as soon as possible. The earlier it is conducted, the more unprepared the object of evidence will be, especially in the initial negotiations, and generally it will not distort the facts. At this time, the recording of the dialogue has the greatest value. However, after several negotiations, the other side often narrates from a favorable angle or adopts a defensive attitude. The choice of location is also very important. We should try to find a quiet and undisturbed place to get better recording effect. 2. Try to choose recording equipment with small volume, easy to hide, long recording time and high sound quality. Interviewer, tape recorder or MP3 player with recording function can be used, preferably copied. In addition, telephone recording is generally not as good as live recording. When there are differences in the conversation, the object of evidence may hang up if he doesn't want to continue, but in face-to-face conversation, he can continue even if there are some arguments. 3. Preparation before obtaining evidence Prepare the matters to be obtained and the facts you want the other party to admit. Be prepared for the conversation, including considering the suggested questions and the other party's possible attitude in advance, and how to induce the other party to make a statement. As for whether to make an appointment in advance, it depends on the situation. It is easy to receive a "surprise" effect by going to the door directly, but it is also possible to encounter unexpected situations, such as being rejected by the other party or interrupting the conversation for other reasons. Since the conversation is recorded privately, of course, the most important thing is not to let the object know that you are recording, so the expression and tone should be natural. If you know someone, you should pay more attention. (1) explain the time and place during the conversation, clarify the identity of each speaker and the relationship with the facts discussed, and try to use the full name when talking to enhance the relevance and credibility of the recording. (2) Pay attention to confirmation with other evidence, because confirmation with other evidence is a condition for the admissibility of recorded evidence. (3) Do not use threatening tone for business secrets that do not involve personal privacy or have nothing to do with the case, otherwise it may be considered illegal and will not be accepted. (4) Focus on the narration, admission or denial of facts, and don't get entangled in the argument of legal responsibility. (5) Pay attention to controlling the conversation time, ask the facts you want the other party to admit, and go straight to the point. 5. If necessary, you can ask the notary office to notarize the recording process. If evidence is notarized, the notary office may be asked to notarize the recording process when necessary to ensure the legality of the recorded evidence. The principle of "whoever advocates, who gives evidence" stipulated in the Civil Procedure Law makes the parties in civil litigation have to collect evidence by themselves or by entrusting private detectives or lawyers of investigation companies. Sometimes the recorded evidence secretly recorded by the parties themselves will have better evidence effect. Some parties are worried that after the stolen evidence is submitted to the court, it will cause trouble if it is not adopted by the judge. In fact, this is completely unnecessary. Now this secretly recorded audio evidence has been widely recognized by the court. Because of the recorded evidence used in the lawsuit, it is impossible to obtain evidence successfully if the other party agrees.