Those who have played the reflection 1 1 and Nobunagawa 12, please answer the following questions.

The overall game design of the two games is similar, but I think there are still many differences in details. The development of 1 city is different, because the different construction land and methods lead to the more modular development of the city in the reflection of 1 1, and it is not as flexible as Nobuka 12. 2. The development of science and technology, in terms of development mode and importance, Xinbo 12 mainly depends on the ability of military commanders, which leads to only one kind of science and technology in the early stage, thus greatly reducing the flexibility, while the Three Kingdoms 1 1 mainly depends on construction and combat to obtain the conditions for scientific and technological research, and military commanders are only the secondary factors affecting the speed of science and technology, and scientific and technological research is also more selective. For Nobunaga 12, I think technology is the most important factor to win. Without technology, no matter how many soldiers there are, they are just floating clouds. However, the main factors of the reflection 1 1 have become the gimmicks of military commanders, and the factors of science and technology have fallen far behind. The diplomatic system is different. I really don't understand nobunaga 12' s diplomacy. Personal feuds between different families made the diplomatic process I wanted impossible. The reflection of 1 1 is more flexible and the diplomatic skills are more diverse. 4 War mode, Nobunaga 12 adopts the battle mode of the Three Kingdoms 9, and there is no way to operate accurately after the sale. The operation mode of reflection 1 1 makes the display of tactics and strategies more purposeful, thus greatly increasing the operability. Generally speaking, these two games have similar effects, except for the actual operation, they are both very enjoyable and good games.