Do you really understand "subjective initiative"

Friends who study thinking patterns and work skills may have heard of similar analysis methods such as "3W 1H, 5W 1H, 5W2H 1E". "W" and "H" are the first letters of five interrogative pronouns in English. Their specific explanation is:

As the name implies, the function of these so-called analytical methods is to strengthen the depth and efficiency of thinking in the analysis process. My own understanding is to help me quickly grasp the essence in my work and act according to the rules.

In my own definition, it is "subjective initiative".

This word was encountered many years ago and was deeply impressed. In the process of internal reflection and external learning, I also completed my own system bit by bit, solved the problem in the process of application and played a role.

Similarly, my own "subjective initiative" system is also composed of the first letters of several English pronouns:

Personally, I think that the underlying laws of different analysis methods are actually very similar, and the learning process is actually an internalization process. You don't have to use "3W 1H, 5W 1H, 5W2H 1E". As long as it suits you, you can innovate your own system from yourself. There is no right or wrong in learning, only what suits you. But I prefer to call it "subjective initiative" directly. Compared with the awkward method of "2W 1H 1M 1N", it is low-carbon and environmentally friendly.

Let's take a concrete look at these five contents:

For example, chestnut: once the training was over, the superior sent a message to me and B respectively, asking us to report the trainer information of Group A and Group B respectively.

B reacted quickly at that time, and immediately began to code words quickly in front of the computer, listing the names of 40 people in group B one by one, and then attaching all the information of this person after each name. After working for about half an hour, I saw that the document was full of words. Although it doesn't look very messy after typesetting, to be honest, no one has the desire to see it.

And I don't want to work so hard. I know that my superiors chose to let us report the information of the trainers at the end of the training, with the aim of "putting them in suitable positions according to their training evaluation and personal expertise". Of course, I don't want to see full-screen text without screening.

Therefore, I first gave the overall data of the number of personnel in Group A, the distribution of each age group and the distribution of academic qualifications, and then classified them according to the training evaluation from good to bad. Personnel data are listed in it, and the data only requires a few names and corresponding positions. Finally, I added a personal evaluation and career advice to personnel in concise language.

It took less than ten minutes to add up before and after, and then it was sent out and got the second reply from the other party, but B never received the reply from the other party.

The standard of a thing is the judgment of the deliverer, which is what we often hear: "put yourself in the other person's shoes and look at the problem from the other person's point of view." If you simply follow your own hypothetical standards, the result is often just touching yourself. To paraphrase Lei Jun, "Many people are willing to do anything to avoid real thinking".

For those who have just worked for a long time, I suggest asking multiple question marks on their own initiative when receiving each assigned task: "Why does he want me to do this? What is the purpose of his doing this? " When you form this habit, your efficiency in grasping the essence of things will be improved subtly, and you can achieve the situation that "one eye is a message".

Give me a chestnut: I was deeply impressed by a scene in Ode to Joy. Andy's role had a vain quarrel with her office romance. They are under the same roof, but they don't want to talk to each other.

One day, Qiu's boss asked Qiu to take out the bad bill for financial reimbursement, which was very interesting. Love rat, a white man, is responsible for the compensation. Love rat is love rat. Because of the asymmetric information, she insisted that the bill did not meet the reimbursement requirements, and Qiu didn't want to take a blank look, so she had to go back and report to her boss angrily. The boss must be unhappy, saying that this is in full compliance with the reimbursement regulations and ordered Qiu to run away. And Qiu had to bite the bullet and go again. It is conceivable that he was fooled by white again. When Qiu told his superior again that he couldn't submit an expense account intact, the boss was anxious. Today he not only ordered Qiu to solve this problem, but also severely reprimanded Qiu.

Is Qiu Yingying pitiful in this respect? Of course it's pathetic. A girl was caught in the middle. But is she wronged? It's hard to say. All her boss wants is "smooth reimbursement". If you want to solve the problem for him, then you should not bring her a "white financial statement, which cannot be submitted, which is not in compliance with the regulations."

When she went to Bai for the second time, she had to check the regulations on bill reimbursement herself to find out whether it was the boss's misunderstanding or Bai's deliberate difficulties. Now that the internet is so developed, Baidu knows that it really can't. There are so many people in the finance department, why not ask more people? You know, if you stay clear about the situation, you can be justified in the face of the boss's reprimand, and you can also give him a face with facts in the face of Bai's spite.

Tasks delivered at work tend to pay more attention to results. When taking over the task, it is suggested to take "solving the problem" as the starting point. After taking the initiative to understand each other's intentions, we should figure out what the other party wants to solve and what his expected result is, and then take corresponding actions. Don't move your head.

Give me a chestnut: once my superior asked me to come out for a birthday party. Yes, it's just a word. There's nothing to add. After asking for advice, I realized that this time the superior only provided a "decision to pat the head", and I was responsible for planning, preparing, hosting and organizing all the work.

But I accepted it gladly. For me, who has never organized similar activities alone, this is an opportunity to expand my ability. So I first searched the relevant information on the Internet, figured out the general process and several key links of an activity similar to a birthday party, and then imitated and innovated my own activity script and reported it to my superiors for approval. With the script, there are rules to follow. We have finished the manuscript, PPT, music, prepared the birthday cake, arranged the activity venue, arranged the switch lights, delivered the cake, lit the candles, propagandists and representatives of the birthday girl, defined the activity flow of all personnel including the birthday girl and the interaction plan with the participating leaders, planned the steps and rhythm of the whole process, and guided and commanded the people present and the participating leaders through the host. Make sure they work closely with the whole activity, and of course, there are corresponding emergency plans ... The whole activity went smoothly and made the front page of the unit news network. What's more commendable is that the activity atmosphere is very active and everyone involved is very happy. This is a real affirmation of the results of the work.

Plan ahead, be able to make a general report to the boss in advance, get feedback in time, and make changes in time; In a word, it can completely guarantee the smooth development of the whole activity without any accidents. Maybe sometimes you can finish the task without thinking so much, but with clear thinking, you can always carry out your work with ease and naturally keep up with emergencies.

Take a simple chestnut: Your boss asked you to do a complete dance program. Do you choose to use the version that has been skipped countless times in previous years or choose to "bring" the popular Little Apple and seve online? Your boss asked you to make a complete report. Do you choose to code out a well-written document or make a well-organized visual PPT? Your boss asked you to publish a complete bulletin board. Do you choose to spray posters in advertising companies or make dynamic posters with H5? You are welcome to scan the code to watch.

Although bosses need "traditionalists" who strive for perfection, with the improvement of work rhythm, they pay more attention to the efficiency and benefit of work results. Therefore, those "innovators" who keep pace with the times can generate value more efficiently through innovation and will be more favored by bosses. Of course, how to output efficiently depends on how you think and plan.

We don't mention chestnuts here, leaving it to everyone to play their own subjective initiative to think.

I wrote a lot this time. Before braking, it is customary to sum up in one sentence: