Have you made clear the difference between waste bid, waste bid, waste bid and flow bid?

In government procurement activities, both the parties involved in government procurement and the government procurement supervision and management departments will deal with invalid tenders, invalid tenders and invalid tenders. However, it is necessary to define and distinguish the concepts and nature of invalid bid, invalid bid and invalid bid, which are easy to be confused and confused.

Invalid bidding and invalid bidding.

The meaning of "invalid standard" and "invalid standard" is the same, but they are different. From the linguistic point of view, one is the format of "form+name" and the other is the format of "subject+predicate". It can be said that the bid evaluation committee finds that the bid of a certain unit is invalid, and its bid is invalid. On the other hand, if the bid evaluation committee decides that a unit's bid is invalid and its bid is invalid, it is not grammatical. Therefore, although these two words have the same meaning, we should pay attention to the distinction when using them.

Scrap bid and flow bid

The terms "invalid bid" and "invalid bid" sometimes have the same meaning in government procurement activities, and sometimes they are different.

Consistent statement: In the bid evaluation process of a government procurement project, when there are violations of laws and regulations that affect justice, the bidders' quotations all exceed the procurement budget and the purchaser cannot pay them, and there are less than three bidders who meet the professional requirements or substantially respond to the procurement documents, they have to reorganize the procurement. At this time, we can say that the project is "invalid" or "failed".

Let's put it another way: a government procurement project, through the process of bid opening and evaluation, determines the winning supplier. However, after the result of winning the bid was announced, the financial department received a complaint. After investigation, one bidder of this project did not substantially respond to the requirements of the procurement documents, which should be judged invalid. At first, only three companies participated in the bidding. As a result, only two companies met the requirements, and the financial department made a decision accordingly: the project was invalidated and re-tendered according to law. In this case, usually the bidder will not say that the project bid failed, because the project was originally successful and was later abandoned by the financial department because of complaints.

"Abolishing the standard" is more about the action and the result of human action. "Flowing bid" is more of a state, expressing the failure of procurement, which is equivalent to aborting the procurement project before it started.

Invalid bidding and invalid bidding

In government procurement activities, there is a great difference between "waste bid" and "waste bid". "Invalid bidding" is only for bidders whose bidding documents do not substantially respond to the requirements of procurement documents, and it is an invalid bidding; "Cancellation of bid" means that for a procurement project, if there are four situations stipulated in Article 36 of the Government Procurement Law, the bid shall be deemed invalid.

Due to problems in bidding, the bidder was judged as invalid by the bid evaluation committee. Some bidders say that their bids are invalid, but this statement is actually wrong, because their bids can only be "invalid bids", not "invalid bids". How to prevent invalid bidding? See the previous article.

"Scrapping" of Government Procurement and "Scrapping" of Engineering Construction

In the Interim Provisions on Bid Evaluation Committee and Bid Evaluation Method (OrderNo. 12 of Seven Ministries), Measures for Bidding and Bidding of Construction Projects (Order No.30 of Seven Ministries) and Measures for Bidding and Bidding of Construction Projects (Order No.27 of Seven Ministries), the expression of "invalid bid" means that there is something wrong with the bid documents, and the bid evaluation committee will treat it as invalid bid. The "invalid bid" here is aimed at bidders, which is also a common practice that "my bid is invalid" and "my bid submitted is invalid".

However, it is not difficult to find that the bidding documents of bidders are not valid by carefully consulting the Bidding Law and the Regulations for the Implementation of the Bidding Law. It seems that the original intention of experts who make laws and regulations is to match the concept of "invalid bidding" in the field of engineering construction with that in the field of government procurement.

Through the above comparison, it can be summarized as follows.

1. Scrap mark and scrap mark have the same meaning, but the language description is different. In view of the bidder's bidding behavior and the bidding documents made by it, it was judged invalid because it did not substantially respond to the requirements of the procurement documents.

2. The invalid bid is a kind of bidding failure of the whole procurement project, and it can only be re-tendered. Pay more attention to behavior than failure in bidding. In the past, in the field of engineering construction, there was a saying that the bidding documents were invalid.

3. Bidding failure, also for the whole project, is an abortion in the bidding activities, paying more attention to the country than the abandoned bid.

For more information about project/service/procurement bidding, and to improve the winning rate, please click on the bottom of official website Customer Service for free consultation:/#/? source=bdzd