Joke Collection Website - Public benefit messages - How to check for bribery
How to check for bribery
From tens of thousands of QQ, SMS, WeChat and other chat records, some key information was extracted, which eventually became the "evidence in court" that confirmed the bribery of officials. In recent years, this approach has gradually become the “ trump card ” for the Dingyuan County Procuratorate in Anhui Province to investigate and handle job-related crimes. The procuratorate has built the second electronic data inspection and identification laboratory for grassroots hospitals in the country, making the investigation and handling model more “intelligent”.
“The electronic data inspection and identification laboratory has the functions of recovering, evidence collection and identification of data in various mobile storage media such as mobile phones and hard disks, providing strong technical support for the investigation of occupational crimes.” Dingyuan Wang Zhiming, chief prosecutor of the County Procuratorate, said that with the effective use of high-tech equipment such as electronic data inspection and identification laboratories and physical and mental monitors, the investigation concept has shifted from "from confession to evidence" to "from evidence to confession", "changing the past reliance on "Investigation methods for solving crimes using oral confessions"
Data show that in the past three years, the Dingyuan County Procuratorate has investigated and handled 66 major cases of various job-related crimes and cases involving 92 people. rate and guilty verdict rate both reached 100%.
Evidence was locked in 5,000 text messages, and the director who tried to get through was defeated
In August 2016, the bribery case of a certain director of Dingyuan County, Li, was settled. Chuzhou Intermediate People’s Court In the second trial, Li was sentenced to 2 years and 2 months in prison and fined 200,000 yuan.
The detection of this case is not easy. Li has been the "top leader" in the township for a long time. He has rich social experience and good psychological quality. It was once difficult to make breakthroughs in the detection work.
Cao Zheng, a police officer from the Anti-Corruption Bureau of the Dingyuan County Procuratorate, said that after Li arrived at the case, he had always insisted that he had been framed and that he would hold the other party accountable for the false accusation and frame-up. At the same time, Li continued to confide to the investigators about his difficulties and difficulties in judicial work and his long-standing achievements as head of the government, in an attempt to change the topic and get through.
How to find out the truth when facing such a suspect? Here, the investigation information platform of Dingyuan County Procuratorate played a big role.
“During the preliminary investigation, it was discovered that there were repeated economic transactions between Zhang and Li, an important briber, including multiple normal loans and abnormal bribery and bribery.” Cao Zheng revealed , in order to find out the facts of this case, the technical department performed data recovery on the mobile phone that Li carried with him, extracted the communication records, text message records and other information in his mobile phone, and then compared and sorted out the more than 5,000 recovered text messages. More than 30 pieces of important information were released, and the debt transactions, interest payments, return of bribes, etc. with Zhang were gradually clarified.
On the other hand, the investigators also conducted a psychological test on Li, and combined the analysis results of the data recovery on the mobile phone and some of the documentary evidence obtained in the preliminary investigation to "tailor-make" a set of tests for him. question. During the test, which lasted more than an hour, although Li pretended to be calm, his inner "secret" had already been exposed.
When the investigators accurately exposed Li's "quibble" based on the test results, Li's psychological defense completely collapsed and he quickly confessed that he had used "collecting IOUs" to accept bribes from Zhang and large amounts of cash from others. the criminal facts.
Massive evidence verification and psychological games finally defeated the experienced "opponent".
QQ chat records restore illegal facts, and electronic evidence becomes "evidence presented in court"
In July 2016, the Dingyuan County Procuratorate undertook the case of Wang's bribery in the financial system assigned by the superior court. Extraordinary cases.
Wang’s mistress Jin was also prosecuted by the prosecutors on suspicion of conspiracy to accept bribes, using influence to accept bribes, and illegally granting loans. The amount involved amounted to more than 60 million yuan.
The reporting began in 2014. A briber reported Wang with his real name many times. After being assigned by the superior court, the investigation task of the case fell into the hands of the Dingyuan County Procuratorate.
“This is the largest bribery case ever handled by the Dingyuan Procuratorate.” Zhou Jinshun, director of the Anti-Corruption Bureau of the Dingyuan County Procuratorate, recalled to The Paper that after receiving the report clues, the court verified the relevant information through investigation situation, decided to open a case for investigation.
- Previous article:My girlfriend is now going out with other men behind my back and sending ambiguous messages.
- Next article:Deceptive courier information
- Related articles
- Why can’t I log in to Thor Accelerator?
- The most romantic good night greeting message
- Why does China Merchants Bank call the credit card investment hotline?
- Why can't the mobile phone send short messages and open the short message function?
- What's wrong with wechat tips?
- Has anyone sent you a New Year greeting now?
- Weihai Wendeng SF Express Address
- How to overcome the psychology of always wanting to buy new clothes?
- What's the number of Jiangsu Wuxi Mobile SMS Center?
- What does it mean to send a text message to someone, and the phone shows that the other party has not received it for the time being?