Today, I accidentally saw a person's name on BBS-Qingdao Wang Wenjie. Can someone tell me what happened to him?

In February 2006, Wang Wenjie's Qingdao Qiyuan Import and Export Co., Ltd. signed a copper mining agreement with Wu Hanzhong, general manager of Shanghai Chu Hang Industrial Development Company, and Dana, an American, and agreed to jointly mine Zambian copper mines in Africa. As Qingdao Company has paid a certain fee for this project in the early stage, Wu Hanzhong should pay 6.06 million yuan to Qingdao Company as agreed in the contract. At that time, the payment was made by Shanghai Airlines Chu Company. Because Wu Hanzhong was the general manager of Shanghai Airlines Chu Company at that time, and the remittance was also a wire transfer form of Shanghai Airlines Chu Company, Wu Hanzhong asked to write a receipt to Shanghai Company. There is reason to believe that these funds are the expenses approved by Shanghai Airlines Chu Company, and even the projects that Shanghai Company actually participated in.

On March 9th, 2006, Chu Hang signed an agreement with Qingdao Qiyuan to import fuel oil as an agent. Qingdao Qiyuan helped Shanghai Chu Hang find Unocal, a Russian fuel oil supplier, and signed an import contract with Unocal in its own name. Shanghai Chuxing paid a deposit of 654.38+05 million yuan to Qingdao Qiyuan (of which 654.38+00 million yuan was a bank acceptance bill). According to the agreement, Qingdao Company opened a letter of credit with the amount of US$ 8,365,438+0,000 with Unocal Company in China Construction Bank to purchase fuel oil. However, due to the fact that Shanghai Chu Hang did not recognize Unocal's delayed delivery time, a dispute arose between the two parties, and Shanghai Chu Hang asked Qingdao Company to cancel the contract with the company. Immediately, Qingdao Qiyuan returned 8 million yuan according to the request of Shanghai Chu Hang (Shanghai Company only asked for 8 million yuan, because both parties were still negotiating other business at that time).

In September, 2006, Chu Hang suddenly defaulted on its debt, refused to recognize the copper cooperation business with Qingdao Qiyuan, and demanded that Qingdao Qiyuan return130,000 yuan. In fact, at this time, Qingdao Qiyuan only needs to refund 62 1 10,000. To this end, Qingdao Qiyuan submitted relevant contracts, agreements and receipts to the other party for review. So this 62 1 10,000 has not been returned for the time being. Since then, the two sides have not delved into this matter, but have continued to cooperate with other businesses.

June 5438+February 2006, Chu Hang, Shanghai reported this common civil dispute in Shanghai! ! !

On May 8, 2007, Wang Wenjie was criminally detained by the Economic Investigation Detachment of Shanghai Pudong Public Security Bureau on suspicion of economic contract fraud.

Arrested on June 26th, 2007.

On October 20th, 2008, Shanghai No.1 Intermediate People's Court sentenced him to life imprisonment for contract fraud.

2009 165438+2009 10 On the day of the Shanghai Higher People's Court upholding the original judgment, Wang Wenjie was knocked unconscious in court.

However, there are many questions in this case, whether it is the means of handling cases or the process and result of handling cases:

1' Wen Jie was convicted of contract fraud, and the so-called contract was a Fermat contract. And my husband has never seen this important contract, let alone signed it! Such a fabricated contract was used as evidence?

2' The so-called other evidence is mostly the witness of the informant, and the witness's confession is changing at any time!

When Wen Jie was sent to the detention center, his mobile phone was detained by the public security organs for three months before being handed over to Wen Jie, but the short messages were deleted for no reason, and all the short messages that could be used as key evidence were gone! !

4' In the second trial, the presiding judge unexpectedly skipped the cross-examination procedure and rudely interrupted Wen Jie's lawyer Wei Peng (one of the two defense lawyers) for questioning the evidence and describing the strong evidence. How is justice in Shanghai?

In the' 5' file, when the court judges, prosecutors and lawyers read the newspaper, they all saw the note approved by someone in the Political and Legal Committee. "Who approved the note from the Political and Legal Committee: hurry up and try to close the case in Shanghai as soon as possible!" . How to be fair when state cadres interfere in the administration of justice?

6' Why do leaders emphasize conclusions in Shanghai? That's because of their guilty conscience! To say the least, even if the case is established, it should be under the jurisdiction of the people's court where the crime was committed, not Shanghai.