I only have text messages

Do you want to ask if you can win the case in court under such circumstances? The simple answer is as follows:

One. Legal and factual issues

1, you claim that the other party wants you to borrow 50,000 yuan, and you have to prove the fact that the other party owes money;

2. IOUs are not the only evidence to prove that both parties have borrowed money. The text messages and telephone recordings you mentioned can be used as evidence. SMS is weak, but recording is better.

3. If you only have these evidences, the possibility of winning the case is also there, but there are certain risks, especially if it is cash delivery;

4. In addition to recording and short message recording, you should also be able to collect other evidence, such as bank remittance voucher (if you were there) and other evidence to prove the source and destination of the money (if you don't have bank remittance), which will also help win the support of the judge.

Second, the judicial practice

China's current laws have broad provisions on private lending, and the discretion scales in the practice of local courts are also inconsistent. Therefore, according to the different discretion habits of the judges in your province and city, the results may be different. Courts in Beijing, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Nanjing and other places have their own unified standards of adjudication on this issue.

Three. Deal with suggestions

Because such cases seem simple, there are actually many professional operations and precautions, and the judgment standards of local courts are slightly different. I suggest that you bring all the materials to the local law firm or other legal service institutions for face-to-face detailed consultation, so that the relatively professional lawyers in this field can answer your next handling methods, matters needing attention in recording evidence and further collecting evidence in detail.

If you have any questions, you can ask them. If you are satisfied, please adopt them. Thank you!