A Zhejiang woman was told that she would not be hired if she had a boyfriend. What is the meaning of the company CEO’s move?

When a woman from Zhejiang applied for a job, she was told that if she had a boyfriend, she would not be hired. In fact, the company CEO’s move had no profound meaning. The first reason was that the company CEO lacked a girlfriend. The second reason is that the company has just been established, the business is not good, and the pressure is high. People do this to vent their emotions. ?

Recently, when a woman from Zhejiang was looking for a job, she was told that anyone with a boyfriend would not be accepted. After she blocked the other person, she received another message from the other person? You didn’t restrain yourself? Boyfriend, does not meet the job requirements? Such a text message, the woman said she was very speechless when faced with this situation. In fact, after later understanding, the company CEO's behavior did not have any profound meaning, and it was mainly due to personal reasons.

The first reason is that the company’s CEO lacks a girlfriend. It is understood that although the woman blocked the other party at that time, the other party was still unwilling to give up, saying that he was anxious to find a girlfriend, and the woman did not meet his criteria for finding a girlfriend because he already had a boyfriend. He later explained that it was better for him to be single because he had been busy with work and had not had time to find a girlfriend. If the woman in this position is single, he will have one more chance to find a girlfriend. Faced with such bizarre replies, it is indeed quite speechless.

The second reason is that the company has just been established, the business is not good, and the pressure is high. People do this to vent their emotions. In addition to the reasons mentioned above, the person in charge also told the media afterwards that because he was the CEO of the company, which had just been established, he found that it was not mature enough and the business was not particularly good, so he was under great pressure. Sometimes I just say this to vent my personal emotions. I have to say that this approach is too ridiculous and immature. Not only is the company immature, but even the CEO is not particularly reliable. It is simply child's play. I feel that only by distinguishing between public and private matters can things be done well. If personal emotions and official matters are confused, no wonder the company cannot develop.

The above is the reason behind the CEO’s actions.