Three weeks after the defeat, how did the Russian army fight the battle of Lederman?

Some people think that Russia wants to complete its strategic adjustment by giving up Borman. But in my opinion, Russia's move is completely forced, because once Russia wants to win Boman again, it will inevitably pay a very painful price.

First, the Russian army will be defeated, because the Russian army, as a strategic location in eastern Ukraine, did not resist too much, and Hongliman has always been a key point in the struggle between Russia and Ukraine, and the Russian army lost this strategic location because the Russian army did not resist too much against the Ukrainian army and quickly withdrew its military strength. When dealing with the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, Russian high-level officials have always adopted an ambiguous attitude. It is necessary to know that the Russian army cannot have too strong combat effectiveness without determining accurate strategic objectives.

With the support of western countries, the Ukrainian army also has the strength to counter Russia. At the same time, the strategic goal of the Ukrainian army is much clearer than that of Russia. Therefore, driven by the advantage of clear goals, the Ukrainian army will inevitably launch a strong counterattack against the Russian army in Hongman area.

From the perspective of military strength alone, Russia does far surpass Ukraine, but the conflict situation between Russia and Ukraine is too complicated to determine the outcome of the war by relying solely on military strength. In the face of the strong counterattack of the Ukrainian army, the Russian army did not show any will to fight at all from generate, which made the Ukrainian army encounter no decent resistance when attacking Lieberman.

The official explanation of military behavior is a strategic adjustment, but in my opinion, the Russian army did not resist too much, which is the main reason why the Russian army lost the battle of Lieberman.

Second, the Russian army was besieged by the Ukrainian army and was defeated for three weeks. In order to reduce the casualties of the army, the Ukrainian army did not take the strategy of storming in time when attacking the Hongman area, because a sudden storm on the Russian army would inevitably meet with strong resistance from the Russian army. Only by besieging the Russian army for a long time can the Russian army lose enough combat effectiveness.

Because the number of Russian troops in Hongliman area is far less than that of the Ukrainian army, Russian troops can only choose to wait and die in the face of the siege of the Ukrainian army, but they cannot choose to launch resistance against the Ukrainian army.

After being besieged by the Ukrainian army for a long time, there were serious problems in the supply of Russian troops. You know, once soldiers lose supplies, the morale of the army will inevitably be severely hit. It was under the guidance of the long-term siege of the Ukrainian army who defeated the enemy without fighting that the Ukrainian army was able to reoccupy the Hongliman area.

Although the actions of the Ukrainian army cannot destroy the effective strength of the Russian army, it can effectively reduce the casualties of the troops, which will certainly bring considerable help to the Ukrainian army in launching the next round of counterattack.

3. After the Battle of Hongman broke out, the Russian army withdrew all its military forces from this area. If the Russian army wants to hold the Hongman area, then the Russian government should dispatch elite troops to confront the Ukrainian army. Only by occupying absolute superiority can the Russian army suppress the counterattack momentum of the Ukrainian army.

It is a pity that the Russian army did not adopt a counter-offensive strategy, but chose to withdraw all the Russian troops deployed in Hongman. It is precisely because of this move by the Russian army that Russia's offensive momentum in the Ukrainian battlefield has been repeatedly frustrated.

After Russia withdrew its Russian troops from the region, it did retain the effective force of the army, but the battlefield situation changed rapidly. If Russia wants to continue to occupy the region in the future, it will inevitably pay a higher price.

Judging from this battlefield choice of the Russian army, the Russian army did make a very wrong choice. If we don't choose other ways to reduce the impact of the failure of the Lederman campaign, then the Russian army is likely to face the fate of failure.

Russian officials did not give up the Red Riemann region, but only wanted to recapture the Red Riemann region with military force. The Russian army does have a problem of lack of confidence. If we don't work hard to improve the morale of the army, then the Russian army will inevitably face continuous failure.