Does oral entrustment have legal effect?

In the legal sense, it is legally effective to entrust others to sign contracts orally. The forms of entrustment include oral entrustment and written entrustment. As long as the other party to the contract agrees, there is no problem. If the other party to the contract does not approve it, it will involve the problem of how to prove the authorization authority, which will easily lead to unnecessary disputes. The oral form is flexible and simple, which is convenient for the parties to adopt. However, because there is no oral written evidence, it is often difficult to verify the dispute. The principal-agent of major civil legal acts shall generally be in written form. Where administrative regulations stipulate that it should be in writing, it should be in writing. If the parties agree to use written form, it shall be in written form. So the form of contract can be divided into oral form, written form and other forms.

Article 469 of the Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC) * * * The parties may conclude a contract in writing, orally or in other forms. Written form refers to contracts, letters, telegrams, telexes, faxes and other forms that can tangibly express the contents contained. A data message that can tangibly express its content through electronic data interchange, e-mail, etc. , and can be retrieved at any time, are considered in writing. Article 165 If the power of attorney is in written form, it shall specify the name of the agent, the matters to be represented, the authority and the time limit, and shall be signed or sealed by the principal.

How to judge oral entrustment contract

Judgment of oral entrustment contract: 1, where one party has fulfilled all or major obligations and the other party has accepted the performance, the contract shall be deemed to be established; 2. If both parties have no objection to the necessary terms of the contract, but dispute the unnecessary terms of the contract, the contract shall be deemed to be established; 3. If there is sufficient and effective evidence, the contract shall be deemed to be established. What matters is the fact that the parties reached the contract, not the way of proof.