What responsibility do you have to bear to swear to death?

Is the online swearing service legal? Of course not. Let's give you a detailed introduction with a case. What happened: Mr. Zhou, a citizen of Xuzhou, accidentally read an article on the Internet about the professional company's "substitute scolding": now there is a new profession on the Internet-"substitute scolding", including phone scolding and SMS scolding, and it is clearly priced. They have professional "curse hands", which are very slippery. They can abuse each other's ancestors, parents, brothers and sisters, children and all relatives in the worst language. Moreover, the language of swearing is obscene and changeable, with some swearing in the street and some swearing by fools. The so-called "bitch cursing the street" means cursing the worst swearing words of ordinary people with the tone of rural women; "Mischief Mixed Swearing" is a company that launches swearing short messages: edit as many as hundreds of ugly swearing short messages in advance and send one to the scolded person every few minutes. According to insiders, QQ, e-mail and chat rooms are also used as swearing tools. Call the other party occasionally, one is to test whether the other party is turned off, and the other is to remind the other party to read the short message. How to ensure the "quality of service" to customers, after swearing, employers will be provided with telephone recordings, QQ chat screenshots and so on. Telephone scolding: scolding the other party at least 30 times a day for at least 30 seconds each time, with a charge of 100 yuan; SMS instead of swearing: send no less than 20 swearing messages with different contents in one day, each with no less than 30 words, and charge 80 yuan; Scold QQ: surf the Internet once a day, leave a message of not less than 300 words, and charge 40 yuan. After listening to the most direct swear words of these people, they will feel depressed within a few days. "Just one word, cool." A buyer on Taobao who didn't want to reveal his net name told me that the world is full of wonders. He found a scolded shop through the introduction of others, and it took 40 yuan nearly ten minutes to scold the stranger on the other end of the phone. It is understood that this "swearing shop" has been doing well since it opened in June this year at 5438+ 10. Lawyers remind: such professional substitutes publicly abuse others through telephone, internet, QQ, games and other channels, which is an act of infringing on others' reputation rights. If the circumstances are serious, it will be suspected of libel, insult and other crimes. Those who have a bad influence on others will be investigated for relevant criminal and civil legal responsibilities. When people feel uneasy, depressed, misunderstood by others, and their rights are not guaranteed, they will curse for venting, but the psychological venting method of swearing cannot be abused. Online professional substitute scolding not only brings great troubles to the victims, but also affects the social atmosphere. Professional substitute scolding not only harms social civilization, but also violates the law. According to whether the facts are fabricated, they can be divided into slander and insult. If the circumstances are minor, the employer and the scolding agent shall bear civil liability. If the circumstances are serious, both employers and employees will even bear criminal responsibility.

Legal basis:

Article 246 of the Criminal Law publicly insults others or fabricates facts to slander others by violence or other means, if the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention, public surveillance or deprivation of political rights. The crimes mentioned in the preceding paragraph, except those that seriously endanger social order and national interests, can only be dealt with by telling. If the victim informs the people's court of the acts specified in the first paragraph through the information network, but it is really difficult to provide evidence, the people's court may request the public security organ to provide assistance.