SMS bombing is illegal.

I believe that many mobile phone users have been harassed by "SMS bombing", which is the common feeling of all mobile phone users. Moreover, not only the mobile phones of ordinary people, but also the mobile phones of NPC and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, which make laws, are not spared. China's advertising law clearly stipulates that without the consent or request of the parties, no unit or individual may send advertisements to the parties by electronic information; In violation of the provisions, a fine of 5000 yuan to 30 thousand yuan may be imposed. The "Regulations on the Management of Communication Short Message Service" issued by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology also clearly stated that short message service providers and short message content providers may not send commercial short messages to users without the consent or request of users; Offenders may be fined 1 10,000 yuan to 30,000 yuan. However, the customer service of the group-sending platform said that there is no policy and complaint risk in group-sending advertising SMS, that is to say, the group-sending platform has not been informed or punished by the regulatory authorities. In this context, businesses will naturally "text bomb" mobile phone users for the benefit!

It is illegal to bombard mobile phone users with advertising messages. Why do illegal platform merchants "have no policy and complaint risks"? One of the reasons is that there are too many short messages, and mobile phone users are numb and have no sense of complaint; The second reason is that the regulatory authorities are dereliction of duty and have no awareness of law enforcement for illegal platform businesses; The third reason is that platform merchants have become accustomed to their illegal activities. No one complains that there is no supervision. What are the taboos? However, merchants should not forget that mobile phones belong to users, and they are not given to users by merchants for advertising experience. You have no right to harass users at will. Merchants are not only immoral, but also daring and breaking the law. Isn't this the bottom line for businesses to trample on or challenge our laws?

"Double Eleven" can not only be a flurry of businesses, but also a great opportunity for the regulatory authorities to strengthen law enforcement and curb illegal activities, because no business will miss the great opportunity of "Double Eleven" to make money, that is, when businesses want to break the law. From the previous correlation, although there are punishment measures in China, many businesses have not been punished for mass advertising messages; Moreover, many businesses have deep pockets and rich profits, and a fine of tens of thousands of yuan does not have much deterrent effect on them. Cai Xiangnan, a lawyer in Quéven, Zhejiang Province, believes that, first, the regulatory authorities should strictly enforce the law and punish businesses that violate the regulations through spam messages; The second is to order the e-commerce platform to restrain merchants and urge telecom operators to technically limit this behavior of sending a large number of advertisements in a short period of time. The advertisement "SMS bombing" makes mobile phone users have nowhere to hide. This is not the victory of the business, but the sorrow of the law and the sad reminder of the relevant law enforcement departments!

Maybe someone will say, won't you handle the business of "SMS interception" or blocking spam messages? It is said that all communication departments have such services. However, I want to know which mobile phone users don't need such spam messages. Why doesn't the communication department close such a spam message channel? Why do communication departments collude with merchants who send spam messages to illegally harass mobile phone users? In my opinion, both mobile phone manufacturers and operators need to provide high-quality services to users, and it is their service responsibility to prevent users from being harassed by spam messages. Why can't we actively curb the spread of spam messages? Isn't it all for money, for money, for morality, for the law to make money? It is the responsibility of the whole society to curb the spread of spam messages. No one should be a bystander!