Will the United States and NATO send troops? The United States and NATO have recognized this cowardice.

Recently, the situation on the Russian-Ukrainian border has become tense again. The United States is rumored that Russia will mobilize more than10,000 troops to attack Ukraine, and use this as an excuse to provide Ukraine with a large amount of weapons assistance. Just recently, Pentagon spokesman Kirby said that the United States will ship guns and ammunition to Ukraine this week. Because of the support of the United States, the Ukrainian government has frequently criticized Russia in recent years. Especially after receiving American weapons recently, the Ukrainian side has sent the main force of government troops to the eastern border of Ukraine.

Looking back on1February 7, the dialogue between the heads of state of the United States and Russia on the Ukrainian issue, it is generally believed that the two sides did not reach an understanding, which made the situation in Ukraine develop in a more uncontrollable direction. Coupled with the external factors of the other side providing arms, many media describe the current situation in Ukraine with a tense atmosphere and the smell of gunpowder in the air! Just when people predicted when the war would start, the United States suddenly and unexpectedly "confessed." President Biden publicly announced that the United States and NATO would not send troops to protect Ukraine.

On February 8, US Eastern Time/KLOC-0, US President Biden publicly stated that although the United States and NATO support Ukraine in "opposing aggression", it does not mean that the United States and NATO are obliged to use force against other countries for Ukraine's sake. Biden said: Article 5 of collective defense stipulates that if any NATO member is attacked militarily, it means that all members will be attacked and all members will send troops to participate in the war. However, Ukraine is not a member of NATO and does not apply to "these legal obligations and moral obligations". Biden bluntly said that the US government is not discussing the possibility of sending US troops directly to the end in order to "protect Ukraine".

It is not surprising that the United States will not send troops directly to Ukraine. Because although the overall paper strength of the US military is stronger than that of the Russian military, because the US military has made too many enemies and the front line is too long, its power to pour into Eastern Europe is not as strong as that of Russia. Once the United States and Russia go to war in Ukraine, Russia can easily put most of its main forces into battle, but it is unlikely that the United States will deploy too concentrated troops to help Ukraine. Moreover, the current financial situation of the United States is worrying, a large number of debts are on the verge of default, and the fiscal deficit in fiscal year 2020 is close to the GDP of the United Kingdom that year. If the United States rashly goes to war with Russia, it is likely to collapse its already precarious economy. For the United States, it is the best way to refuse to send troops directly to the battlefield and strengthen Ukrainian government forces through a lot of military assistance and training, so that they can be consumed by Russia.

Although it is unlikely that the United States will send troops directly to the battlefield, it is surprising that Biden actually said in front of the world that he would not send troops to "defend Ukraine." People all over the world know that the Ukrainian government now dares to provoke Russia so radically and is so loyal to the United States because many people believe that the United States will "cover the bottom" for it. In addition, regimes in many parts of the world also hold this view. For example, some countries forget their ancestors and naively think that the United States will protect them. Biden's statement now will not only greatly defeat the pro-American forces within the Ukrainian government, but even other pro-American regimes in the world will shake their confidence and dependence on the United States. Biden's speech, not surprisingly, will bring another major blow to the already shaky international reputation of the United States, thus further disintegrating the servant camp of hegemonic countries.

Why would Biden say such a thing that harms the interests of the United States?

Aerospace jun believes that there are three possibilities. First, in order to "step on the brakes" for Ukrainian militants, the right-wing radical forces in Ukraine have always hoped to solve the problem in eastern Ukraine by force, and even many people advocate counterattack into Russia. At present, Ukrainian government forces and right-wing armed forces take the initiative to provoke and crack down on civilian armed forces in eastern Ukraine. If the United States does not "step on the brakes" for their increasingly radical behavior, it is entirely possible for them to directly wage war against civilian armed forces and even Russian troops in eastern Ukraine in the future. If Ukrainian government forces and right-wing armed groups take the initiative to provoke war, it will inevitably put the United States in an extremely passive position. Therefore, even if Biden threatens to damage the credibility of the country, he should cool down the provocative behavior of the increasingly angry Ukrainian government forces and let them know that the United States will not cover their radical behavior.

Second, in order to stimulate Ukraine to join NATO. Biden made it clear in his speech that it is the "obligation" of the United States to send troops to support NATO members. This remark may stimulate the pro-American forces within the Ukrainian government to apply for NATO again in order to obtain the guarantee of the United States. On the other hand, the United States can use this as a condition to ask the Ukrainian government to cede more national sovereignty and further strengthen its control over Ukraine.

Third, conform to the development of the situation. In fact, as early as 65438+February 2, NATO Secretary General Tins? When answering the question about the possible military response of NATO in the case of Russia's "invasion" of Ukraine, Stoltenberg has indicated that Ukraine is not a member of NATO, which means that it does not have the same security guarantee as other member States. Canned food Stoltenberg's words are tantamount to selling his teammates to cover up his "pretend" before the war. Biden, continue this time. tins Stoltenberg's words are nothing more than finding yourself a step down!

But in any case, Biden's statement is tantamount to publicly "recognizing" Russia. Even if the above two goals are achieved, it is obvious that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In the final analysis, it is the hegemonic ambition of the United States that expands to the point where its strength cannot be supported, which leads to such funny political events happening frequently.

Looking back at Ukraine, it turns out that Ukraine's biggest enemy is not Russia, but western capitalists bent on splitting Ukraine! As the "legacy" of the former Soviet Union like Russia, the situation in Ukraine and Russia shortly after the disintegration of the Soviet Union is basically the same, and the development context of both sides is basically the same. In order to realize the change of economic problems, Russia and Ukraine at that time chose to move closer to the west. In order to integrate into the west, the former national honor was even discarded as garbage. In order to show its sincerity in embracing the West, Ukraine chose extreme ways to disarm after briefly becoming "the third largest nuclear-armed country in the world". Undoubtedly, these actions of Ukraine are aimed at truly becoming a "member of the West". However, 30 years have passed since the disintegration of the Soviet Union on February 26th 199 1. Ukraine still has not been treated sincerely by the West and has not become a real so-called "Western country".

Ukraine's experience is undoubtedly sad, blindly catering to the United States has not brought prosperity to Ukraine, but the war has ruined everything! No matter how the situation in Ukraine develops, whether it is a fight or not, it is still the United States and Russia, and Ukrainians are bleeding! This shows how important it is for a country to take its own destiny into its own hands. Without independence, it can only become a chess piece or even a chessboard in the struggle of a powerful country.