Is the accountant or cashier responsible for the boss's request to remit public funds to his personal account?

The main responsibility for this kind of thing is still on the boss, but the accountant and cashier did not adhere to the principle and violated the relevant provisions of the accounting law, and should also bear the corresponding responsibilities. Now we can only collect relevant evidence, such as references and text messages when the boss asked the cashier to transfer money.

If the company's public funds are deposited in the cashier's private account, and the company's legal person or cashier misappropriates the company's funds, according to the provisions of the Criminal Law: employees of companies, enterprises or other units misappropriate the company's funds for their own use or lend them to others in large quantities by taking advantage of their positions, and fail to return them for more than three months, or engage in profit-making activities or illegal activities, and the amount of property is not more than three months, they shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention. Whoever misappropriates a huge amount of money from a unit or refuses to return it shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years.

1. However, if the company's public funds are deposited in the cashier's private account for the daily business expenses of the company, it is a normal economic business and there is no misappropriation of public funds. According to the provisions of China's civil code, obtaining ownership must comply with the law. Therefore, in this legal sense, no property crime can really obtain ownership. The crime of misappropriating public funds violates property ownership as well as the crime of corruption. The difference lies in the degree of infringement of ownership. At the same time, it is precisely because the crime of misappropriating public funds directly violates the right to use public funds, violates the system of using public funds in the national financial management system, and therefore violates the national financial management system.

2. The cashier himself is a person with civil capacity. He should know and analyze. According to the provisions of the Securities Law and the Enterprise Management Law, the major shareholders of the New Third Board Company shall not participate in enterprise operation. So you should also know that the major shareholder is not the manager of your company, which will increase your responsibility. Even if it is not a listed company, it must obey the arrangement of the leader. According to previous cases, we should also bear certain responsibilities. On the contrary, if you refuse and get fired in retaliation, the law gives you the right to claim compensation. Legal persons remit public funds to private accounts. As long as the accounting and cashier procedures are legal, they are not responsible. They mainly obey the wishes of legal persons. This pot must be carried by the legal person himself.

3. General company accounts can only remit money to the public. Private remittance can only be made when the bank pays wages or personal reimbursement, and the bank will check the corresponding vouchers, so this will not happen generally. If you want to transfer money from the corporate account to the private account of the legal person, you can only write a cash check to withdraw it several times and deposit it in a fixed private account. It is best to go through the relevant procedures in accordance with the company's financial system. So that accountants and cashiers have no responsibility. Legal person remits money from company account to private account.