Girlfriend birthday boy buys a car, breaks up by text message.

Because the court obtained the relevant case, after investigation, it was found that the car given by the man and the woman during their love was not a gift, and there was no gift relationship between them, but a loan relationship. Therefore, the court supported the plaintiff's appeal and asked his ex-girlfriend to return the car purchase price and pay interest, mainly based on facts, seeking truth from facts and taking the law as the criterion.

In this case, the man submitted a payment certificate on behalf of both men and women, and both men and women signed the certificate to confirm its validity. The vehicle is registered in the woman's name, and the man pays for the car. However, the chat record provided by the woman failed to clearly indicate that the car was a gift, so there was no gift relationship between the two parties and it belonged to a loan relationship. Therefore, according to the relevant laws and regulations, based on facts and taking the law as the criterion, the court asked his ex-girlfriend to return the car purchase money and pay the corresponding interest. So we can see why the court supports it.

Many netizens have condemned the man's practice online, thinking that the man gave the luxury car to the other party when he was in love, and immediately turned his face after breaking up. He not only asked his ex-girlfriend to return the car, but even asked for interest. This kind of behavior is the behavior of love rat and the chicken thief, and completely regards love as financial management. However, no matter how he criticized the man on the Internet, the man, with the support of the court, always asked the woman to return the corresponding fare and interest. In fact, it is the same in itself, because the court has made a judgment.

Through the above related contents, we can roughly know why this man's request will be supported by the court, mainly because the evidence provided by this man proves that the relationship between the two is a loan rather than a gift. It is precisely because of this that the court supported the man's request under the existing evidence and national laws and regulations.