Refutation skills in debate competition

Refutation skills in debate competition

Refutation skills In the debate competition, the school will often hold some debate competitions, and many students like to participate in the debate competition, so that they can exercise their courage and eloquence. The most important thing in the debate is rebuttal. Let me share with you the rebuttal skills in the debate and learn together.

Refutation skills in the debate 1 common refutation skills 1. Convince people with reason and refute them head-on.

This is the most commonly used rebuttal technique. It is to prove the error of the other party's point of view with the simplest language and the simplest logical reasoning. This method is suitable for the viewpoint that you are fully prepared but the other party has not fully proved it. Positive reasoning refutation is a waste of time, so it should only be used on the most closely related arguments in the debate field. It should be noted that conciseness is the key to the success of positive reasoning and refutation.

Common skills of refutation II. pay sb back in his own coin

In the debate field, don't panic if the other side is arguing about mobile phone intelligence. The tit-for-tat idea is to let the audience return the applause to the other debater. The method is very simple, that is, under the guidance of the wonderful words of the other party, immediately find a similar fact that is beneficial to you, and respond accordingly, giving people a sense of superiority. This kind of rebuttal is not to show the logical relationship between things. But in order to show the wit of the debater on the spot,

To do this, debaters should pay attention to increasing their knowledge reserves in peacetime, and on the other hand, strengthen the cultivation of their psychological quality, so as to remain calm and optimistic when the situation is unfavorable.

Of course, this kind of contest is not good for many rounds. On the one hand, it gives people the impression of digression, on the other hand, it is suspected of grandstanding.

Common skills of refutation 3. Push the boat with the current and go with the flow.

This trick, like the last one, is to attack yourself with the help of the other party. The difference is that tit-for-tat is the charm of the other language. And this promotion is based on the power of the other party's logic. To put it bluntly, we use the other side's argument to prove our argument.

So how can we achieve this effect? The key lies in thorough logical analysis.

If we can design a dilemma, we can follow suit.

Common skills of refutation 4. Clever metaphor, hit the nail on the head.

In many cases, simple reasoning is boring. Using analogy can not only enliven the atmosphere, but also make the refutation vivid and easy to understand.

But pay attention to:

(1) The analogy between the two objects should be similar, so that the audience and the judges can't react in a very short time.

(2) the style of analogy should be high, and it is forbidden to compare what you think, so as not to be counterproductive.

Everything must be familiar to everyone, otherwise it will have no effect.

Common skills of refutation 5. Save for a rainy day, it is better to start first.

Generally speaking, it seems natural to refute it. But here, I want to introduce a trick is to refute first. First of all, I know your argument. Before you speak, I will refute your argument to pieces. When you carry it out again, it will be as boring as eating a ready-made meal.

Requirements are:

(1) We made a thorough analysis of the debate before the game and thoroughly knew ourselves and ourselves.

(2) The competition system determines that the first and fourth debates cannot be modified at will, and the seemingly dead East is used flexibly by us.

Our argument is satisfactory and easy to be accepted by everyone. Otherwise, it will be self-defeating and let the other side strike first.

Pay attention to these three items, and you can also refute the last item with confidence.

Common skills of refutation 6. Attack in a roundabout way and seize the main line.

In the debate field, we pay attention to initiative everywhere. If you refute just for the sake of rebuttal, you will inevitably appear passive and follow your opponent everywhere. Even if our rebuttal is wonderful, it is not superior. How can we not only strongly refute each other, but also unconsciously guide each other to discuss in areas that are beneficial to them? Realizing what the other party is saying, what we say is the first thing to do. A clear-headed and quick-thinking debater will perform well at this moment.

The common skills of refutation seven, volley, majestic.

A common phenomenon in the debate field is that one party runs out of time first. So how does the other party seize this favorable opportunity? At this point, after the whole free debate, the truth that can be made clear has already been made clear, and the audience is exhausted. So what matters at this time is momentum, not reason. At this moment, it is appropriate to refute that it is not appropriate to take sides; It is better to compare short sentences than to argue. This way can often achieve the effect of turning the tide.

Refutation skills in debate 2 1. According to the common mistakes in the debate, we can seize the favorable counter-attack opportunities from the following aspects:

(1) Cognitive error.

All people in the world, due to congenital or acquired reasons, theoretical or practical reasons, can not all people have the same thoughts and understanding. This difference in human understanding is manifested in the fierce ideological confrontation in the debate. Refuting with cognitive errors is the best fighter for successful demonstration.

(2) Logical error.

People's thinking is the reflection of the objective world, and the development of the objective world has its own laws. Whether writing an article, giving a speech, or arguing about a problem, it is inseparable from logical reasoning. Therefore, it is also a good opportunity to attack by catching the logical mistakes of the other side.

(3) errors in expression.

Before discussing, it is necessary to explain the meaning of expression. Anyone who uses words to "express ideas outward and reach others" is called expression. Debate is also a form of expressing ideas. In a tense debate, the other party often appears to be "careless in choosing words" or "careless in using words", and the other party's mistakes in expression are also good opportunities to fight back.

2, choose the breakthrough point of rebuttal

Refutation is an important part of debate, and the process of refutation is actually the process of debate. In this process of ideological confrontation, it is full of skill and artistry. In our daily life, we often encounter this situation: we know what the other party said is wrong, but we don't know how to refute it. Even if you refute it, it is often irrelevant, and even leaves the other side with a handle for counterattack. However, if we are good at finding the most favorable breakthrough, we can easily refute each other with one arrow.

The breakthrough point of refutation is to use the art of refutation in the process of refutation to achieve the goal of winning against the mistakes in the other party's theory. The more accurate the choice of rebuttal entry point, the faster you can make a major breakthrough in the debate, leaving the other side speechless and convinced.