The inheritance of good family style in the debate depends on the answer to the parents' question: isn't it the parents' fault that you don't teach?

Teaching, teaching and learning. The transfer of knowledge is a complete process of information transfer. Since it is information transmission, there must be two parts: "sending" and "receiving". Good home wind energy can't be passed down, not only depends on whether it is taught, but also depends on whether the children have learned. Only when both sides react correctly can knowledge be passed on. Therefore, it is biased to simply emphasize teaching and ignore learning.

Secondly, the topic is to discuss where the inheritance of family style is important, not whose fault it is to raise or not to teach. It really doesn't matter to prove that "parents are the most important" with "it's the father's fault to raise or not to teach" The topic discusses the inheritance of family style. Since it is hereditary, it must be that parents are willing to teach and children are willing to learn. At this time, "inheritance" came into being. With inheritance, let's discuss which side is more important. "Don't teach", then there is no "inheritance" at all. Who is more important than who? Therefore, it is beyond the scope of the topic to say that it is the father's fault to raise and not teach.

This example is similar to: "If the teacher doesn't attend class, his salary will be deducted. Isn't it important for the students to get good grades in the exam?" Obviously, this is the bull's head is not the horse's mouth.