What do you think of working overtime in the work group after 90?

Lying and watching, sitting and watching, tired of sitting, climbing the window to watch. Don't always give your hat to the post-90s generation. Although the boss and employees are superior and subordinate, it is necessary to give them some respect, but it does not mean that the boss can do whatever he wants. This incident is obviously that employees think that what the boss said is wrong and argue with the boss directly in the work group. Is it necessary to exaggerate the incident with the words post-90 s and moral kidnapping?

Say "post-90 s" first. This word is a special word used by modern people to describe people born in 1990. It is regarded as a commendatory term, but I don't know when it started. Some people always like to associate it with a certain kind of people, especially to describe something that has great influence and is a negative event. Take this event as an example. In the workplace, after 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 or even 00, which generation has never been an eyesore in the workplace? Which generation of migrant workers lack bosses and bosses? Don't always judge a group of people by their age, which is unfair and objective.

Let's talk about "taking the boss in the work group". If it is a normal work exchange, employees have the obligation and responsibility to obey the arrangement of the boss and manager, but obedience does not mean blind obedience and reasonable compliance requirements, and employees need to abide by them. However, if it exceeds the employee's tolerance or bottom line, the employee has the right to resist. Although it seems to protect the legitimate rights and interests of both workers and enterprises, the reason why the state formulates labor laws is actually more inclined to this. Because enterprises are in a strong position, more than 50% of labor disputes and arbitration cases in the past were caused by enterprises' violation of management, deduction of wages and illegal layoffs. Can't this explain the problem?

Take "moral kidnapping" overtime as an example, which is obviously beyond the scope of compulsory overtime, so employees have the right to refuse. Since business owners want employees to make contributions, they should adopt a good attitude and listen to their opinions. Employees only return to their bosses, not personally attack them. There is no stipulation in the labor contract that they must obey all the orders of their bosses, nor does it stipulate that employees cannot pay attention to their bosses.

Therefore, in my opinion, it is normal for this employee to worry about the boss in the work group. Everyone is an adult. No matter whether the incident is right or wrong, there are legal constraints at the national level, moral constraints at the individual level, and enterprises have labor contracts and labor laws. As long as you are prepared to bear the consequences, all the stars in the sky dare to try to pick one, not to mention an unscrupulous boss.