King kong's word of mouth

The word-of-mouth of sacrifices is polarized.

First, bad reviews

1, Silentstorm: This movie may have been shot for only one day, from morning till night, and it was just cut for two hours because of the large seats.

2. Anonymous: I didn't see someone say it looks like Dunkirk before, but after seeing it, it means that this thing is like touching porcelain on the moon compared with Dunkirk.

3. Kong Li: When the film can't convey the justice of resisting US aggression and aiding Korea through the narration at the beginning and end of the film, the audience obviously doesn't buy it. We can't correctly express why we won, but we can only shock people with one tragedy after another, which actually leaves an impression on the audience that the war is won by one sacrifice after another.

This is not the root cause of victory. What is the root cause of victory? Whether the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea is just, whether Chinese people's Volunteer Army is under the leadership of the Party, and whether the people of all ethnic groups in China are mobilized by the Party. To avoid this triple expression, the landing point can only be from an external perspective.

4. Dedicated to jv Huang Fan: Only logic can be true, only truth can be emotional, and only emotion can be moved. For this kind of war movie adapted from the history of resisting US aggression and aiding Korea, it is obviously inappropriate to make it into a superhero movie with personal heroism like Wolf Warriors. Of course, this is not to say that the whole story of King Kong is a superhero movie, but the climax of it, which is too illogical for war.

5, big brother: logical injury plus structural injury, real historical events have been adapted into lies. Advantages: the actor's performance is in place. Disadvantages: The scriptwriter's trace is too obvious.

Second, praise

1, beaten by capital: After watching the biography of King Kong, I burst into tears when Zhang Yi said that he would change the squad leader with ten shells. As a film that has only been filmed for two months, this degree of completion is already very good, and it is still worth the ticket price on the whole.

2. Film juicing: Resisting US aggression and aiding Korea is a grand and extremely complicated proposition. The historical, political, military and diplomatic issues involved are complicated and intertwined, which cannot be studied clearly in a few lifetimes.

So, don't expect a 120-minute movie to show the whole picture, all you can do is get a glimpse of the leopard. "Sacrifice" is such a film that "you can see the whole leopard from a glimpse, but you can see the whole leopard from a glimpse".

3, spring rain is like wine: finished reading. The film is still very good, belonging to the upper-middle class in domestic war movies. The biggest feature is the use of two-line narrative, just like Dunkirk. Shouting slogans is more restrained. Perhaps the three-month shooting time is hasty and the characters are somewhat alienated. Therefore, the whole film intends to create a feeling of epic fable, and the atmosphere is very good.

4、? Honest man: Generally speaking, I think the director has undoubtedly interpreted a seemingly simple story in a very limited time and space, especially the portrayal of people, which is easy to resonate with the audience. At the same time, the whole picture, composition and special effects also make me very pleased. The film industry in China is indeed making continuous progress.

5.HaGaU: The point, line and surface of a battle are intertwined with our enemy's perspective from our individual perspective, and finally reach the climax of the whole battle. Sacrifice fully reshaped events and restored history.