Are there any details in "The Crowd" that deserve our attention?

Many emotional scenes and mother-son scenes were deleted, causing the relationship between Zhou Quan and Li Xiang to progress too quickly. The line between Li Xiang and his son was extremely weak, and some areas were a bit stiff, especially in the obvious areas. Reflecting on the scene where Li Xiang goes to Brother Hua to borrow game props, people really want to flip the table. Do you think Li Xiang is being unreasonable? This kind of deleted continuity of the plot is criticized by some viewers. area. In fact, it is not the minutes of footage that are so important. Wan Qian herself said that actors are here to serve the film and should accept these. Analysis

Director Rao is a director who is very striving for excellence and is very good at depicting ordinary people. I think the lack of these details is indeed due to the fact that for the whole film, there must be some protagonists of the characters. give up. Crowds of People is a drama with two male protagonists. Cutting out Xiao Miao and Zhou Zhou will cause the main plot to be discontinuous. At this time, it is necessary to give up Li Xiang. If I were a director, I would choose to cut Li Xiang instead of Xiao Miao, let alone Zhou Quan.

Understand this type of addition and subtraction thoroughly. From the perspective of the audience, the two male protagonists play smoothly, the perception is just fine, and I can understand the shortcomings of the main plot. From the perspective of fans, due to the deletion of Li Xiangxian, some people felt that Wan Qian made a mistake in mastering the role, and that the emotional progress was too fast and inconsistent with the storyline, thus questioning her performance. This is something I don't want to see. She created a three-dimensional character based on a specific script, but because it was cut out and the plot was weak, she was even questioned and couldn't stand up. Isn't this frustrating? It is not an exaggeration to say that 99% of the audience This situation cannot be seen or understood.

With just a twitch of the computer keyboard, he could dismiss the famous actor with a quivering "I don't think so". So I tried to take a look at the line between Li Xiang and Zhou Quan based on part of the film plus a deleted part. On this line, Li Xiang’s characterization was unsuccessful. Plot

Twelve years without a husband, Li Xiang still raised his children very well, "Everyone in the school knows you", this is the original sentence of his son Li You. Turning herself into an independent woman, but her child still insists on having a father. If Li Xiang doesn't curse me, I will curse her. This is the most popular point from Li Xiang's perspective. But what if I am Li You? Is it wrong for him to want to have a father? After the quarrel, the children left, and Li Xiang threw his myopia glasses on the table. Only later did he have the extremely blunt "Li wants to borrow game props from Zhou Quan" in the play. , many viewers scolded Li Xiang for this behavior. I admit that even if it was not edited out, there were foreshadowings of a mother-son quarrel, Li wanted to borrow game props, or there were storylines that I did not accept in my three views.

I really want to criticize this paragraph. My understanding is that even if I quarrel with you, my mother would like to stuff you back into her belly. In the end, she may give up her own loyalty for the sake of the baby. So what is Li Xiang doing for you? My son gave in. In order to give his son a father at his graduation from elementary school to junior high school, actor Zhou Quan, who has always regarded himself as a "savior", is the best choice at this time. The moment Zhou Quan put on his space suit and ran towards Li Xiang, not to mention Li Xiang, a single-parent mother who had raised her son alone for 12 years, even I, an old man who was about to run for three years, was moved. When I saw a man, I was moved. The moment you had no hesitation, just a moment of fireworks? No, I can want to spend the rest of my life with him, even if the cost is to meet another playboy.

Some people said that it was unnatural for Li Xiang to put Zhou Quan in the car and take him home because he was splashed with water while driving. Because I feel like that, the most I can do is compensate someone else for a new piece of clothing or a piece of clothing from a dry cleaner. Because the film indeed deleted too many scenes between boys and girls, I only suspect that the interaction between Li Xiang and Zhou Quan when they got out of the car was cut out. Zhou Quan must have some language or expressions that allowed Li Xiang to learn to let down his guard. This behavior made Li Xiang want to take him home. Besides, what kind of mother raises what kind of son? If Li You wanted to send the wet clothes to Zhou's family in full, then Li You would have asked a thug to take the soaked jeans to his home immediately. If you slap the face too much, you will get slapped (English in capital letters and bold: Not recommended for children to learn!). Is the behavior of mother and son considered a small foil? Summary

Actually, I didn’t understand this theme very well at first. After all, I’ve seen a lot of stories about swapping lives and exchanging real identities. If you eat too much, you’ll inevitably lose track of what you’re eating. It smells like it would be really difficult for me to enter the theater.

Director Rao said that the final core of the film is "Change your way of life." The film's promotional slogan is indeed "Change your life, change your way of life." Director Rao also said that he is looking forward to the title "The Crowd", which has been criticized by others. Use this name to express a happy prayer, hoping that the epidemic will be over and the streets will be crowded with people. In the interview with Director Bu Rao, I once again said sincerely that Director Rao is indeed very warm. The film made by a warm person can be felt with heart and bring back the sweetness.