Joke Collection Website - News headlines - Is the 1680 yuan silver brick in TV advertisement really collectible?

Is the 1680 yuan silver brick in TV advertisement really collectible?

I advise you not to believe that TV shopping is mostly deceptive. Watch CCTV. It seems that CCTV never broadcasts these TV shopping. It's just that some places broadcast these things for profit, isn't it?

Tv shopping will only give you a shopping phone number, and nothing else. When you find yourself cheated, you can't find the person you want. The people who answer the phone to sell products are specially trained and have written answers in any language situation. Tv shopping 120% fake, but just like the growing population, idiots will move forward wave after wave, and you may be the next one to be fooled!

There are four false and illegal manifestations in collectible advertisements:

First, fictional facts drive up product prices. For example, the advertisement "The Riverside Scene at Qingming Festival" (a long scroll of calligraphy and painting) claims to be based on the original works collected by the Palace Museum and permanently collected by the National Library and the Capital Library; The advertisement of "Golden Diamond Pocket Watch" claimed that the Chinese People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries issued a "National Gift Certificate". These contents are actually false, which is very deceptive to the advertising audience.

The second is to steal the concept and confuse the essence of the product. For example, Mao Zedong colored gold and silver coins, Qi Baishi Zodiac coins, and 2007 Year of the Pig New Year coins are actually just commemorative medals, calling themselves "coins". In addition, according to the relevant regulations, as long as it meets the requirements and is approved by the People's Bank of China and the national postal department, such souvenirs can be made and sold. However, some advertisements are labeled as "exceptions, exceptions and special approvals of state authorities", highlighting the uniqueness of souvenirs and misleading the advertising audience.

The third is to falsely express the prospect of product appreciation. Advertisements often use false words such as "popular, sensational and hot" to describe the sales of products, claiming that "the collection prospect is infinite and the value will soar all the way in the short term" and so on, making unfounded promises or judging the appreciation prospect of products, but avoiding talking about the risk of paying expensive prices to buy products.

Fourth, using someone else's name is suspected of violating the law or infringement. The names of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the People's Bank of China, the State Post Office and other state organs and their staff are used in many places, and the names of the Chinese People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, the National Library, the Capital Library and other units or organizations are also involved in many places. Without consent or authorization, the contents are inconsistent with the facts and are suspected of misleading.

At present, the so-called limited edition "treasures" in China are mostly planned by individuals or private companies. Due to the lack of laws and regulations, the examination and approval procedures for all kinds of "treasures" are still not perfect, and most merchants take advantage of the irregular market, leading to arbitrary pricing and profiteering. At the same time, the press and publication, culture, industry and commerce, taxation, commerce, price, finance, quality supervision and other functional departments still lack strong supervision means for this market. From the aspects of rectifying market order and protecting consumers' interests, this situation needs to be improved urgently.