Analysis of the components of interrogative noun sentences?

I don’t understand what angle you mean by “analyzing sentence components”.

If you look at it purely from the order of words, it can be summarized as follows:

1. Subject + be + predicate (declarative sentence)

The previous sentence becomes general The interrogative sentence is: Be + subject + slogan. In short, on the basis of the original declarative sentence, the position of "be" is moved forward. Everything else remains basically the same (if there is some, something, somebody in the sentence, it corresponds to any, anything, anybody).

2. Subject + do + (object 1) + (object complement, object 2)

First of all, the brackets mean that they can be omitted. For the convenience of explanation, I have divided the five basic sentence patterns in English into two categories.

For the second type, when you want to turn it into a general question, you need to 1) clearly see the form of the verb in the sentence (person, tense, voice, mood), 2) determine the corresponding verb The auxiliary verb (due to the specific tense, mood, and person, the auxiliary verb is also different.) 3) Put the auxiliary verb at the beginning of the sentence. 4) Restore the verb in the following sentence to its original form.

Examples:

1) He saw his friend on the street yesterday.

Become a general question: Did he see his friend on the street yesterday ?

Another example:

2) He had seen the film online.

Become a general question: Had he seen the film online.

If you ask a question about "online", it becomes a special question: How had he seen the film?