Ask for an article about blood donation. The content is mainly about the understanding, suggestions and feelings of blood donation. Simple language will do.

I'll extract the part of an article I wrote about re-understanding blood donation for your reference.

1. Re-understanding of voluntary blood donation means to consider the long-term effects of voluntary blood donation publicity and recruitment, update the understanding of voluntary blood donation in order to promote the sustainable development of voluntary blood donation, so as to publicize voluntary blood donation more scientifically in publicity and recruitment, and gradually improve the public's understanding of voluntary blood donation.

At the beginning of the implementation of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Blood Donation, citizens basically didn't know about voluntary blood donation. In addition, there was a nutrition fee for voluntary blood donation before, and most people volunteered to participate in voluntary blood donation, which caused some misunderstandings among ordinary citizens. The main reason was that blood donation was harmful to health. The negative implication of the nutrition fee for voluntary blood donation. At that stage, in order to dispel the concerns of the general public, the publicity of voluntary blood donation mainly focused on the "benefits" of blood donation, including: blood donation is good for health, blood can be used for free after blood donation, blood donation can be free of charge, and so on. In this case, the understanding of the formation of unpaid blood donation is biased. Why do you say that? Let's make an in-depth discussion.

is blood donation beneficial to health? So far, the two views are still arguing endlessly. If we analyze them, we can see that this debate is actually unnecessary. Physical health depends on a good living environment, a healthy lifestyle, an optimistic attitude and proper exercise. Blood donation is only done occasionally, not a part of daily life, and it has little impact on physical health, even if it is beneficial, its effect is extremely small? This is self-evident. Blindly promoting "blood donation is good for health" is actually misleading. What is the impact of blood donation on health? A more appropriate statement should be that blood donation does not harm health. Based on this understanding, how can we promote blood donation without compensation? This should start with the purpose of blood donation without compensation: when blood patients are in urgent need of blood to prolong their lives, when patients with excessive blood loss (such as bleeding mothers and patients who have lost too much blood during surgery) are in urgent need of blood to protect their lives, a bag of blood donated by unpaid blood donors can give them a chance, and donating this bag of blood will not bring harm to unpaid blood donors. This kind of publicity can make the public understand the significance of voluntary blood donation while dispelling the concerns that it is harmful to the health, which is more conducive to the sustainable development of voluntary blood donation.

It is true that blood can be used for free after blood donation, but how to correctly understand and understand it? In order to encourage citizens to actively participate in voluntary blood donation, the Blood Donation Law stipulates that voluntary blood donors and their immediate family members can be exempted from blood donation fees. Its legislative intention is to encourage voluntary blood donation, and it is not the purpose of voluntary blood donation as ownership (such as property rights and patent rights). However, in the past propaganda, free blood use was often regarded as the focus of publicizing the benefits of voluntary blood donation. The most common thing is to compare voluntary blood donation to a blood bank, and now it is "saved" and "taken out" when needed later, resulting in the absurd formulation that after the death of a voluntary blood donor, the heir inherits the free blood use enjoyed by the voluntary blood donation certificate. The reason for making such an absurd request is to regard the voluntary blood donation certificate as the "passbook" of the blood bank. Since the free use of blood is the property of the blood bank, future generations naturally have the right to inherit it. It is absurd to find out the basis. From then on, it is not difficult to see the consequences caused by improper understanding of free use of blood.

The purpose of voluntary blood donation is to provide safe blood for clinical medical treatment, not to use blood for free. Excessive emphasis on free blood donation is to give up the basics, especially in the publicity of voluntary blood donation, so as to avoid the idea that voluntary blood donation is to use blood for free in the future, especially the metaphor of blood bank.

can I get a free medical examination for donating blood without compensation? This view is actually wrong. There are seven blood tests. These tests are only for blood safety, which is far from the standard of health examination. Moreover, the key to health consultation in the process of unpaid blood donation is the relevant forms filled out by the unpaid blood donors themselves, and the items included in them are all promised and guaranteed by the blood donors themselves. How can they be considered as health examinations? In the past, in order to attract more citizens to participate in voluntary blood donation, it was very common to publicize that voluntary blood donation can be free of charge. This kind of propaganda misled voluntary blood donors, but it brought great hidden dangers.

Some people saw the propaganda that blood donation can be checked for free, and they were worried that they couldn't find a place to check whether they were infected with some blood infectious diseases, so they participated in blood donation for free medical examination, and the results were normal after blood donation. However, some blood infectious diseases have a window period, and antibodies can't be detected during the window period, but they are contagious, so patients who eventually transfuse this blood will bear great risks, which will bring great problems to blood safety. At present, this situation is very common. Some help-seeking websites can often see anonymous inquiries: high-risk XX days, blood donation is qualified, can HIV infection be ruled out? This has sounded the alarm for our propaganda. The purpose of voluntary blood donation is to provide safe blood for clinical medical treatment, but our propaganda has brought unsafe factors. The fundamental reason is the misunderstanding of voluntary blood donation.

It can be seen that it is necessary to re-understand blood donation without compensation. The purpose of blood donation without compensation is to provide safe blood for clinical treatment. Blood donation without compensation can be completed without affecting one's health. Blood donation without compensation is a social responsibility. Only by taking this correct understanding as the basis of voluntary service of blood donation can it play a greater role in promoting the development of blood donation without compensation. Undeniably, the utilitarian propaganda about unpaid blood donation in the past did play a certain role in promoting the development of unpaid blood donation, and also caused these utilitarian concepts to be deeply rooted in the thoughts of some unpaid blood donors. However, with the development of unpaid blood donation today, the social environment has changed greatly, and the conditions for changing these outdated understandings have been met. As voluntary blood donation service workers, they should first update their understanding. On the basis of improving their understanding, they should vigorously publicize the concept of "donating blood to save lives and offer love" in the process of voluntary service, and take the purpose of unpaid blood donation as the propaganda focus, and finally realize the citizens through a long-term subtle role.