The implementation of double random and double open supervision in China refers to double random and double open supervision.

Double random, one open, that is, in the process of supervision, randomly select inspection objects, randomly select law enforcement inspectors, and timely disclose the spot checks and survey results to the public.

Double randomness and one openness refers to a new supervision mode and principle adopted by the government in the process of supervision. Specifically, double randomness refers to the random selection of inspection objects and law enforcement personnel in the process of supervision. One publicity refers to the openness and transparency of the supervision process and results to the society.

The double random open supervision mode has the following advantages: it improves the fairness and impartiality of supervision. Because the inspection objects and law enforcement personnel are randomly selected, the interference of human factors is avoided, and every enterprise has the opportunity to inspect, which reduces the discrimination and injustice of supervision.

Improve the efficiency of supervision. By randomly selecting law enforcement personnel, the problems of professional mismatch and manpower shortage are avoided, the supervision cost is reduced and the supervision efficiency is improved. Improve the self-discipline consciousness of enterprises. Through the open and transparent supervision process and results, enterprises will be more self-disciplined and law-abiding, actively cooperate with the supervision departments, and avoid unnecessary misunderstandings and disputes.

The role of randomly selecting law enforcement prosecutors

The role of randomly selected law enforcement inspectors is to ensure the fairness and transparency of administrative law enforcement. This approach can avoid possible conflicts of interest and prejudice in the process of law enforcement, and at the same time improve the public's trust in law enforcement agencies.

Randomly selecting law enforcement inspectors can avoid injustice within law enforcement agencies. If law enforcement officers are engaged in the same law enforcement work for a long time, some inertia thinking and prejudice may be formed, thus affecting the fairness of law enforcement.