Seven Controversy about Abduction in Weibo.

The kidnapping in Weibo needs to be discussed from many angles.

Multi-dimensional thinking from different angles will be more conducive to the deep excavation of the problem

Netizens upload photos of beggars through street shooting. Will this kind of network action with a little sports characteristics just make begging children temporarily hide from the wind and fail to achieve the purpose of rescue? In addition, there is still controversy between the right of citizens to beg and the use of children to make profits. Public opinion has also been objectively transferred because of the beginning of street shooting activities, and it is impossible to pay attention to other focus events ... For the final solution of the social chronic disease of children begging, multi-dimensional thinking and discussion from different angles will be more conducive to the in-depth excavation of the problem.

However, it should be emphasized that although different viewpoints are based on different angles, they may achieve the same justice. It is necessary to make detailed discussions and suggestions, and it is also necessary to give more affirmation to this effort from the people.

The explosive power of network onlookers is precisely its role in this society.

Persevering expectations should give more systematic and rigid social functions, such as government departments, such as the legislature. More professional or professional non-governmental efforts may require specialized permanent non-governmental organizations to carry out and promote these efforts. Any high-quality civic activities need a more mature and orderly civil society. All in all, the last thing to blame is the onlookers themselves. This is not fragility, but excessive expectations that they cannot and should not bear. The explosive power of network onlookers is precisely its role in this society. The high degree of attention it can bring in a short period of time requires the official to follow up after the pressure of public opinion. Then, if the benign reaction within the system is stimulated and the chronic diseases are completely eliminated, we can certainly be happy, but at the same time, we must understand that this is not a conclusive result that onlookers can guarantee.

Should the law prohibit children from participating in begging?

We absolutely enjoy the freedom to beg, but that is the freedom of adults.

Why do so many children beg? It is said that this is a business. Fortunately, most of the children I see are healthy children. I think the law should prohibit any child from begging. No matter whether he is coerced or forced by his biological parents' livelihood, it is illegal for any child to participate in begging.

Moreover, this is not difficult to implement, because all begging places are crowded places or busy intersections, and there are enough police forces. However, parents who really take their children to beg may think that as long as they are not abducted or coerced children, it is my right and a kind of freedom for me to take my children to beg. It is true that we may not have freedom of the press, freedom of association and freedom of procession, but we absolutely enjoy the freedom of begging, but that is the freedom of adults.

Anyway, always start with the easiest problem to solve.

Many people are really disabled, even their children are disabled, or they really have no choice but to beg, which involves social security and welfare. What do you want those people to do? The subsistence allowance is simply not enough to live, and there is no guarantee if it is a rural hukou. The country can't help you raise children. I believe people still think it is very good for you to beg without collecting your begging tax and management fee. Why should I give you money to support your children in turn?

We all hope that the regulations prohibiting children from begging will eventually be written into the law and strictly enforced. Although a large number of children are abducted and sold to other families instead of begging, in any case, we must start with the easiest problem to solve. So many people have only one child for the so-called national policy and reducing the burden on the country. If the government can't protect that child, then even if you never go bankrupt, you won't have the face to face those docile subjects who are speechless.

It's no big deal to do evil because of kindness.

It is common sense that human trafficking and begging are two things.

Without complicated argument, we can infer from common sense that trafficking and begging are two things. Trafficking is because there are no children, begging is because there are no skills to make a living. Kidnapping children, then disabling them and sending them to beg, will only be a small probability event in terms of risk and cost.

For this group of people, the whole network is murderous, asking netizens all over the country to take big actions, take photos of begging children and upload them to help parents who have lost their children find them. Therefore, the beggar and his son were forced to undergo blood tests just because some people thought that the little beggar looked like his son. There are still so many people who applaud this and think it is a great kindness. They think actions speak louder than words.

Can good intentions cover up evil means?

What are you going to do next? Taking pictures in the street and forcing beggars and their sons to take DNA tests is only the first step. Lynching the beggar's parents and executing the kidnapper is the second step. The third step is to arrest all beggars and send them to forced labor. The final plan is to sterilize beggars and humanely eliminate beggars over 50. Yes, congratulations! That's what the Nazis did

Under any good excuse, people can do whatever they want to vulnerable groups. Because good ends can cover up evil means.

Clever you, please tell me: who abducted whom?

Kidnapping from begging children and finding the wrong direction

Many people mistakenly believe that begging children are mostly trafficked.

Now, one problem is that many people mistakenly believe that most begging children are abducted and are full of confidence in finding and rescuing several children. But in fact, abducted children are mainly sold to families who need children, and there are few beggars, so it is a bit wrong to find abducted children.

The case of Peng Wenle is actually a typical idea of "babies go home". If the child is lost, parents authorize to send photos of the child, and then through the Internet and Weibo, who will look for it after seeing it, which is completely different from begging the child on the street.

We are just doing it, without considering what we should do.

I have a hazy feeling that whether we have been doing what we should do before we figure out clearly. We must have good intentions, we are not seeking any selfish interests, we are just in a hurry; We run so fast that we can't stop to think and listen to other people's opinions. No matter what we should do, we are just doing it.

We moved in a hurry. There is no room for checks and balances and discussion in action. We are constantly moved and pushed by ourselves, the people around us and the internet, as if it were the right thing to do. Will that activity become a sport, running like a runaway wild horse, tired of running?

Kidnapping should not obscure thinking about poverty.

The root of the phenomenon of children begging lies in the poverty at the bottom.

Children should be well raised and educated, not begging in the street.

The phenomenon of children begging and the whole chain behind it are rooted in the poverty at the bottom. The children come from poor families. Those who rent children and sell women are forced by poverty, and those who organize or force children to beg are not poor. The poor and the weak at the bottom attack the weak. Legal justice and moral condemnation are both necessary, but thinking about poverty should not be covered up.

Today, success, prosperity and wealth have won enough respect, but on the other hand, poverty is often regarded as an unacceptable and intolerant state. At the social level, such as prohibiting or restricting begging, cracking down on or eliminating vendors and various restrictions on rural migrant workers, poverty has gradually been systematically excluded. In the face of many seemingly harder reasons such as urban image and urban order, the wishes and ways for the bottom poor to make a living and improve their lives are very weak.

Turning a blind eye to poverty, even excluding and excluding poverty is equally undesirable.

To some extent, the sensitivity and understanding of society to the poor and the poor people at the bottom are also becoming dull. Trafficking in children and girls and letting children beg in the streets can be explained legally and morally, but for the extremely poor, it may be a helpless and difficult choice.

It is cruel to praise poverty, and it is also not advisable to turn a blind eye to poverty or even exclude it. Poverty is an objective fact that needs to be faced squarely. In the face of the real suffering of the people at the bottom, the mind needs to be softened again. The choices made by some people in extreme poverty should at least be understood, even if they are not accepted by people.

The cancer of society is poverty, not begging by children.

How do you know if it was instigated by your parents?

Children love their parents, and children will imitate them. Perhaps parents never instigated their children to beg, but after wandering around the world, the children finally reached out. What do you want your parents to do at this time? Strict discipline? Or do you have to bite the bullet and make a living together? You have observed children begging. How to judge whether it is instigated by parents? Or the inevitable result of imitation?

Unless beggars are forbidden to have children, parents will inevitably take their children with them when begging. What else can we do? Don't send it to a kindergarten for one month 1000 yuan? Therefore, most parents' beggars are surrounded by a little beggar in rags and have to wander the world together. How can you ban them?

Child labor and begging are neither shame nor cancer, but poverty is.

You won't let children beg. Well, you succeeded, but what's the next step? Their parents are still beggars and their children still have no food. What shall we do? An opinion leader on Sina Weibo waved his sleeves: "Then citizens' subsistence allowances and compulsory education subsidies should keep up."

Forgive my ignorance, but I think it's better to directly advise them to immigrate to the United States, which seems more reliable. Are more and more people believing in the social system now? Or are these celebrities on Sina Weibo actually foreign guests who can write Chinese characters? Child labor and child begging are neither shame nor cancer, but poverty is. You can't solve their poverty, but you want to resort to legal means to stop them from making a living. What is the basis of your moral outlook?

The fundamental problem is the social welfare security system.

It reflects the child welfare and social security issues.

The problem of begging children is not limited to "abduction", as some people have suggested: some parents are really forced by life to take their children to the streets to beg. If abducting and selling children is the absence of legal guardianship, then parents begging with their children reflects the problem of children's welfare and social security. In the face of the important proposition of protecting children's rights, it is a question worth pondering how far such a spontaneous rescue operation by netizens can go.

Public participation is important, but to really solve the problem of children begging, in the final analysis, it depends on the government and society to establish a long-term relief mechanism, and put children's rights relief and welfare protection at the height of people's livelihood. Only with the joint efforts of the government and society can the fate of children who are suffering misfortune be reversed. The online "hand-clapping" movement was probably just a blowout of public opinion, and then it was calm, and the growing environment and rights status of children have not been fundamentally improved.

The behavior of netizens focuses on asking questions, not solving them.

To really solve the social problem of children begging, we need to work together with the public under the leadership of the government. Only by attracting the attention of the power to concentrate more public resources is the best way to solve social public problems.

Through this incident, on the one hand, we can't overestimate the action effect of this force. After all, it has certain limitations and blindness. The problem of children begging is a complicated social problem, which involves various interest games and the perfection of social security mechanism, and cannot be solved by Weibo.

I'm afraid the social value of this vigorous "Weibo Abduction" movement should be reflected by realizing the institutional shift from simply "Weibo Abduction" to paying attention to the protection of children's rights and even the environment for children's growth.

People's Commentary: "Weibo Kidnapping" craze needs rationality and the rule of law. At the beginning of the new year, "Weibo's kidnapping" caused a heated discussion, which not only showed the power of social justice, but also showed that our society was showing its valuable willingness and ability to respond to each other and solve problems in cooperation. However, we should also see calmly that we should not let the passion of "Weibo Kidnapping" run amok, but pay attention to ways and means, combine reason with reason, advance in an orderly manner, and improve the scientificity and effectiveness. For example, abducted children and begging children overlap, but after all, they cannot be confused. In particular, most netizens who "abduct" through street shooting and Weibo are not professionals, which may infringe on the portrait rights and privacy rights of begging children; On the other hand, it is often difficult to tell whether the photographed children are begging for a living or being used as tools after being trafficked, and whether the organizer is a child trafficking suspect or a child's parents. In view of this, the legal profession and other professionals appealed that the most important thing is to call 1 10 to call the police and ask the public security department to further investigate and inquire. First of all, calling 1 10 is in line with proper rights protection procedures. And in order to avoid unnecessary conflicts, dialing 1 10 is also the coolest way to deal with it.

At the same time, it should be noted that "abduction in Weibo" is only a part of the whole society's work to control child trafficking. The work of "abduction" has a long way to go. In recent years, relevant departments have been working hard on abduction. In April last year, the Ministry of Public Security announced the launch of the fifth national anti-trafficking special campaign, rescued 6,785 abducted children, issued three batches of A-level wanted orders, and arrested 30 major trafficking suspects. At present, the Ministry of Public Security has established a national database of abduction DNA information and rescued abducted children through high-tech means. By the end of last year, 165438+ 1010,876 children had found their parents through the database.

Under the heavy blow, illegal crimes are still repeatedly banned. Why? As Chen Shiqu pointed out in an interview with the media, one of the main reasons why the crime of abducting and selling children has been repeatedly banned is that criminals can make huge profits from it. Criminals mainly obtain children by kidnapping, and the cost is almost negligible. In kidnapping, a boy can usually sell for 40 thousand to 50 thousand yuan, while a girl can sell for 20 thousand to 30 thousand yuan.

In other words, the spread of interest chain and the serious disproportion between illegal cost and return are the crux of the rampant crime of abducting and selling children. Although there are many clear provisions on "abduction" in China from the Criminal Law to the Law on the Protection of Minors to the notices of relevant departments, how to prosecute offenders, strictly enforce the law, raise the standards of punishment and sentencing, greatly increase the cost of the crime of abducting and selling children, and make it a crime that criminals dare not touch?

The topic in Weibo always changes from one hot spot to another. Those abducted children who forget their parents' looks but still retain their local accents are still a lingering pain in society. The enthusiasm and concern aroused by "Weibo Kidnapping" should not disappear with the passage of time, and the actions and efforts of relevant departments should continue as before. Only in this way can we find new hope for the abducted children.

Weibo, who is looking for the lost child, has been forwarded more than 6,000 times. The first sentence is: "Can the Internet create another miracle?" In fact, in the face of such a complex social problem as child trafficking, the long way to go is not to rely on the miracle of the Internet, but to rely on the power of reason and the rule of law, and to make persistent efforts for a long time to give every child strong care.