What do you think is unreasonable about the university’s dormitory system?

1 In the laboratory, teachers do not need to wear shoe covers, but students must wear shoe covers

This is what I did.

Bring shoe covers with you. Go in without wearing them. He will definitely stop you. Then I said: "Teacher, what's wrong? What's the matter?" The teacher would say: "You have to wear shoe covers." I said: "Oh. I thought the sign at the door was : Please wear shoe covers has expired! Because I saw the teacher was not wearing shoe covers! Can the teacher not wear shoe covers but the students must wear shoe covers? Does our college have such an unreasonable rule? "Unreasonable The teacher might say: "Yes. There is such a rule!" I said: "Oh, that's right. But I know teachers in other laboratories also wear shoe covers! Could it be that the teachers there are of high quality and have strong self-consciousness while the teachers here are Do you have no self-consciousness and low quality?

Then take out the shoe covers and put them on slowly. Smile at the teacher and walk in.

2 The penalty for using illegal electrical appliances is cancelled. Scholarship

What are the standards for illegal electrical appliances? The school has not provided any standards. It is entirely up to his subjective assumptions.

Why do electrical appliances that can be used at home become illegal electrical appliances at school?

When school regulations conflict with the Constitution, which one should prevail?

If it is for fire prevention, why can it be used in family buildings?

Why can teachers smoke in school, because there are many fires caused by smoking? The lighters worn by teachers are also fire hazards

This is a barbaric system!

In this question Some colleges cancel scholarships, while others do not.

In law schools with relatively sound systems, they do not cancel scholarships because they know they do not have the right. Scholarships are an affirmation of learning and are illegal. It has nothing to do with it.

3 The teacher prohibits students who are late from class

I don’t think the teacher has this right.

First of all, the students have paid tuition, that is It is said that the bill has been paid. What right does the teacher have to deprive the students of services that have been consumed but not yet received? If the students are not allowed to attend this class, should the tuition for this class be refunded? Because at this time, the students and the teacher can regard it as The relationship between customers and suppliers is equal on this issue. The contract has been formed and even if the students are unwilling to refund the money, they can't. If the teacher punishes the students for disturbing everyone's study by prohibiting them from attending classes, then the teacher should be punished for not finishing get out of class on time. What kind of punishment? The teacher said: "My motivation is good and I want to teach the knowledge coherently." Our evaluation of right and wrong is not based on motivation but on results. Students who are late want to come in to learn knowledge, too. It's good, but it affects everyone's learning. The teacher's motivation for not leaving get out of class on time is to teach the knowledge coherently, but it has the effect of affecting the rest of the students. So why is the teacher not punished? Whether the teacher prohibits late students from coming to class depends entirely on his own mood. How can we balance everyone if we don't let in and sometimes let in?