On how to improve the quality of cases

Case trial is an important part of discipline inspection and supervision, a key link to ensure the quality of case investigation, and an important guarantee for discipline inspection and supervision organs to implement the policy of strictly administering the party, persist in seeking truth from facts, and run cases well according to discipline and law. General Secretary Hu Jintao stressed that it is necessary to intensify the investigation and handling of cases, focus on solving corruption problems in key areas, and never let corrupt elements escape the punishment of party discipline and state law. In recent years, many cases of violation of discipline and corruption have been punished and achieved good results, and the trial of cases has been further strengthened. However, due to the lack of full-time cadres for farm discipline inspection and supervision, many affairs, weak business and frequent changes, it is still difficult to meet the needs of the development of northern Qingcheng. The Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Farm earnestly performed the function of trial work, firmly established the sense of excellent products, made great efforts to ensure the quality of cases, fully implemented the basic requirements of "24 words", and provided a solid organizational guarantee for investigating and handling cases with high quality and efficiency and improving the trial level of cases.

I. Main problems

(1) Professional quality needs to be further improved. There are many working procedures in the trial of cases, and they are familiar with the characteristics of high requirements of party and government rules and regulations and strict requirements of official document format, which puts forward higher professional quality requirements for judges. Due to the lack of full-time farm discipline inspection and supervision personnel, frequent changes and unfamiliar business, it is difficult to guarantee the quality of case trial because of the need to assist the party Committee in doing the central work.

(2) The investigation and trial of cases need to be further improved. Due to the lack of personnel, in handling cases, discipline inspection and supervision cadres are both investigators and adjudicators of cases, and their supervision and restriction on trials are weakened. For example, in some transcripts, the speaker and recorder are mostly the same person. In this way, when you are both a referee and an athlete, it is difficult to guarantee the facts, evidence, characterization and handling of the case.

(3) Work initiative needs to be further strengthened. The number of cases in the farm is very small every year, with an average of one or two cases per year. However, after the case entered the trial stage, due to the strong professionalism of the trial business, there was a fear of difficulties in the mind, and there was a mentality of "more things and less things", and the initiative was not enough and the enthusiasm was not high, which had some negative effects on the qualitative and quantitative discipline of the case.

(4) The standardization of cases needs to be further improved. The main reasons are that the rationality of documents is not strong, the collection of evidence such as photos is not complete enough, and the binding and filing are not standardized. These problems have affected the improvement of archives quality to some extent.

Second, the countermeasures to solve the problem

There are many reasons for the above problems. The main reasons are the weak coordination of anti-corruption, the lack of coordination mechanism or the insufficient play of its role, and the imperfect or inadequate implementation of some systems. To solve these problems, we must focus on improving the coordination mechanism for investigating and handling cases, take prevention as the goal, strictly implement the basic requirements of "24 words", strictly follow the rules, further establish and improve the anti-corruption working mechanism, and promote the organization, standardization and institutionalization of anti-corruption work.

(1) Firmly establish the awareness of the quality of trial cases and lay a solid foundation for trial cases.

First, strengthen study and constantly improve the professional level of trial work. Always regard the study of discipline inspection as a basic work, take the form of combining centralization with decentralization, special counseling with practical exploration, seriously study the discipline inspection and supervision case business courses, carry out case discussions in combination with trial practice, strengthen the study and research of trial business, and continuously improve the theoretical level and trial ability of cadres' policies.

The second is to establish a system of rules and regulations, and constantly improve the system and mechanism of case trial. It has successively established working mechanisms such as meetings of members of the Commission for Discipline Inspection and cooperative meetings on handling cases. Formulated and issued "Several Provisions on the Party's Discipline Inspection of * * * Green Farm" and "Provisions on the Working Procedure of Disciplinary Action in party member of * * * Green Farm". The practice of joint trial for many years has proved that the system should be improved from six aspects: case transfer, judges' marking, trial conversation, collective appraisal, trial registration and confidentiality, so as to standardize joint trial and ensure the quality of cases. Improve the system of joint trial of cases, unify the scale of discipline, make everyone equal before discipline, and maintain the authority and seriousness of organizational discipline; The establishment of a joint trial team activity system, mutual exchange of experience in handling cases, talk about experience and learn professional knowledge, strengthened the responsibility of trial work, and promoted the standardization and institutionalization of trial work.

The third is to strengthen training and constantly improve the ability to hear cases. In view of the fact that the judges have changed greatly in recent years and their professional quality needs to be improved, we should make full use of all kinds of business training opportunities organized by the discipline inspection and supervision organs at higher levels, strengthen our study, organize a special case trial training every year, and at the same time go out to broaden our horizons, learn advanced experience from other places, cultivate innovative consciousness and improve our business skills. Instead of training by meeting and training by case, we use the opportunity of holding a meeting to focus on the staged problems and typical, complex and difficult cases in case investigation and trial, and conduct centralized analysis, discussion and settlement or public trial, which further improves the comprehensive quality and trial ability of judges.

(two) strictly implement the basic requirements of "twenty-four characters" to ensure the quality of trial.

First, intervene in advance to ensure the accuracy of the case. On the basis of adhering to the separation of investigation and trial, for complex and difficult cases whose policy boundaries are difficult to grasp, the trial team intervened in marking papers in advance, repeatedly communicated with the case handlers, made joint research, and strived to reach an understanding of * * *, and asked the leaders of the trial room of the Bureau of Discipline Inspection to give guidance and check in time, thus forming a high-quality trial report, thus ensuring the trial quality of the case and ensuring the smooth investigation of the case.

The second is strict management to improve the efficiency of case trial. By introducing performance management concepts such as target management, benchmarking management and total quality management, an internal workflow is established on the local area network, and indicators such as the responsible person, working time limit, working standard and work connection of each job are managed online. After the investigation of each case is completed, with the consent of the leaders in charge, the investigation file is signed by the trial team, that is, it is transferred to the trial procedure. The trial undertaker strictly controls the "three customs" according to the requirements of "twenty-four characters", that is, the pre-trial of the case, the joint trial procedure and the filing, which plays a network role in the joint trial. It ensures the relative independence of case trial and provides a solid mechanism guarantee for the quality of case trial.

Third, through joint trial of cases, we strive for accurate trial of cases. Through the implementation of joint trial of cases and joint trial of cases, the contradiction of insufficient manpower of discipline inspection cadres can be alleviated, and the original case of each case has become a joint case of many people; It also solved the problem of many novices and unfamiliar business of trial cadres, and played a role in mutual exchange, learning from each other and improving comprehensive quality; It realizes the separation of investigation and trial, and ensures the quality of the case and the limitation of trial. For the trial of simple party discipline cases, adhere to the contractor responsibility system and collective deliberation system, take the initiative to communicate and coordinate with the Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Administration and relevant departments, form a final handling opinion and submit it to the plenary session of the Commission for Discipline Inspection for research and decision. For judicial transfer cases, pay attention to timely communication and consultation with the judicial department, and carefully review the case materials after obtaining them to ensure proper handling.

(three) strictly implement the rules and regulations of the party discipline, and earnestly safeguard the seriousness of discipline.

First, fully perform their duties and strengthen supervision, inspection and discipline. After making a disciplinary decision on party member, execute the disciplinary decision and report the implementation in accordance with the requirements of "Regulations on Disciplinary Work Procedures of Green Farm party member". In view of the untimely and irregular execution of penalty, the accountability system of penalty execution was established. In recent years, the Farm Commission for Discipline Inspection has established an open supervision network, accepted the supervision of the society and the masses, carefully registered and classified visiting cases, and filed qualified cases for trial to ensure that at least one case is tried every year and reported in time.

Second, adhere to the policy of "learning from the past" and effectively protect the democratic rights of party member cadres. According to the specific circumstances of the case, the specific analysis, accurate grasp of policy boundaries, comprehensive use of disciplinary action and organizational treatment, focusing on education, punishing the very few, education to save the majority. Efforts should be made to punish party member for violating discipline, so that all the party organizations where party member and party member violated discipline received warning education, which not only educated themselves, but also paid attention to social effects, and protected the enthusiasm of party member cadres and officers for starting businesses.

The third is to do a good job in the relevant work after the trial of the case and consolidate the disciplinary results. After each case is closed, we insist on sorting, binding and filing in time. At the same time, the superior commission for discipline inspection issued a written opinion on discipline inspection. In view of the existing problems, carefully find out the reasons, take measures to plug loopholes, establish and improve rules and regulations, and report the rectification to the higher commission for discipline inspection. And make serious rectification to prevent similar problems from happening again.