I am urgently looking for debate examples and famous quotes about knowledge accumulation.

From a personal point of view, the accumulation of knowledge can be regarded as a learning process, while ability refers to the subjective conditions necessary to successfully complete an activity. (Excerpted from Baidu) In other words, ability training is to cultivate a person's ability to complete a certain activity, which can be regarded as a process of cultivating practical experience. When it comes to returning to debate, isn’t it the question of which is more important, the learning process or the cultivation of practical experience?

It seems that the term practical experience is not very accurate, let’s put it this way.

Then let us see whether it is more important to apply what we have learned or to practice and apply it!

First of all, the purpose of learning and accumulation is definitely for use. Whether it is practice or theoretical development, we should agree with this point of view. The purpose of ability training is to use it. The ultimate goals of the two are not contradictory, and there is no question of which came first, the chicken or the egg.

I suddenly feel that giving this example can make this debate more transparent: that is, knowledge accumulation is to teach you 1+1=2, while ability cultivation is to infer from 1+1=2. 110=20. That seems to be the case.

That is to say, ability development is based on the accumulation of knowledge.

But this alone is not enough to be believed. I have never heard of a house being purchased at a large price in the basement. The foundation is not the more important reason, but it can be used as an example to confuse the public.

Ability is the physical and mental energy displayed by people relying on their own intelligence, knowledge, skills, etc. to understand and transform the world. (Baidu) In fact, in the final analysis, knowledge accumulation is the ability to walk, and ability cultivation is the ability to jump. Only when you walk well and walk solidly can you jump well. If ability cultivation is regarded as more important than knowledge accumulation, it will be contrary to the rules and regulations. We should not deny ability training, but should affirm the other party and say that he is important, because the debate itself is a question of which is more important. But once it comes to comparison, we must tell them that college students, everything such as classes, experiments, internships, etc. It is the accumulation of knowledge, not the cultivation of abilities, or in other words, ability cultivation only accounts for part of it. The definition of ability training itself is relatively abstract. I think it is inevitably one-sided. You must have a big discussion in your team.

The first argument of the affirmative: Chairman, judges, classmates, hello everyone! Let me express my point of view below. First of all, as students, our bounden duty is to learn, and our first priority is to learn, so we should learn knowledge; secondly, from the important aspects of knowledge, it can be divided into macro and micro aspects. Macro: Knowledge drives the development of society and the progress of mankind. With the invention of the steam engine, mankind moved from agricultural society to industrial society. With the invention of computers, mankind has gradually entered the electronic information age. This is the work of knowledge. Micro: Knowledge provides tools for realizing self-worth. A person's self-worth is reflected in how much he has contributed to society and how much value he has created. How to create value for society - through knowledge, of course. So it is more important to accumulate knowledge. End of speech, thank you!

Opposition debate: Hello everyone, Chairman, judges, and classmates! Our point of view is that improving personality is more important than accumulating knowledge. Personality can be divided into three aspects. First, it is the sum of a person’s character, temperament, abilities and other characteristics; second, it is an individual’s moral quality; third, it is a person’s qualifications as the subject of rights and obligations. In short, the consistent behavioral tendencies and reaction patterns formed by a person in the process of growing up, which are different from others, are the sum of a person's various psychological characteristics. Therefore, first of all, accumulating knowledge is only a means of perfecting personality, and it is more about continuous cultivation, cultivation and exercise in life practice; secondly, people with high level of knowledge and higher education will only harm others and society if their personality is not perfect; finally, even if The accumulation of knowledge is not enough and the culture is slightly lacking. As long as the personality is constantly improved, it will still benefit society. Professor Chen Xueshi, a famous mental health expert in my country, said: "As age increases, the plasticity of personality will become smaller and smaller." The characteristics of personality in late youth are generally formed, so adolescence is a critical period for personality formation. At this time, personality characteristics should be analyzed objectively, shortcomings and deficiencies should be discovered, appropriate and effective measures should be taken in a timely manner, and training and training should be carried out in daily life. Therefore, it is more important for college students to improve their personality than to accumulate knowledge.

The pros and cons ask each other:

The pros and cons are: Is it the primary productive force, can perfecting personality replace the accumulation of knowledge and promote social development?

Answer: If personality If it is not perfected, can you guarantee that the accumulated knowledge will be used to promote the development of society? Knowledge is a double-edged sword. If used improperly, it will cause great harm to society. Improving personality plays a role in putting the accumulation of knowledge on the right track.

Rhetorical question: If your personality is not perfect enough, no matter how much knowledge you accumulate, it will still be useful? Is it because Liu Haiyang, a top student at Tsinghua University, used caustic soda and sulfuric acid to injure black bears because he did not have enough knowledge?

Correct answer; That’s just an isolated phenomenon!

Fang retorted: Relevant data show that the crime rate of graduates, doctoral students and other high-level intellectuals is significantly higher than that of people with ordinary academic qualifications. Is this still an isolated phenomenon? On the contrary, if you don’t learn enough knowledge, can you not contribute to society and promote social development?

What would you do if you couldn't be hired because you didn't have enough knowledge?

Answer: Failure to apply for a job due to insufficient accumulation of knowledge is only a small setback in life. However, if the personality is not perfect, it is very likely that you will be unable to resist temptation and make mistakes in your future life. Mistakes and even crimes. Weigh it up, which one is more important?

Summary of the positive side;

Let me summarize our statement below: The famous thinker Zola once said: "The whole meaning of life lies in the endless exploration of what is not yet known. In the constant pursuit of "To add more knowledge," as we all know, a person is the purest when he is born, without any thoughts and understandings. In the process of growing up, a certain amount of knowledge is accumulated through the gradual understanding of the surroundings. Personality is very important to a baby. It doesn't make any sense. If he wants to have personality, he must first know personality and understand the meaning of personality. If there is no certain accumulation of knowledge, how can we talk about perfecting personality? Accumulating knowledge is the prerequisite for perfecting personality.

We do not deny the importance of perfecting personality, but knowledge is spiritual food for people. Only by continuously accumulating knowledge will our thoughts not become stale and our personality will be better perfected. Therefore, accumulating knowledge is more important than improving personality. I have finished my speech, thank you all.

Opposite summary:

Let me summarize our submission below. In the current education, students' physical, mental and personality are not harmonious. There are very complicated reasons. But as far as education itself is concerned To a large extent, it stems from the failure to effectively and scientifically coordinate the contradictions between students' physical and mental, academic and personality. In primary and secondary education, students' physical and mental health and personality are sacrificed intentionally or unintentionally. At the expense of this, the erroneous tendency to simply improve students' academic level as the development goal, or to one-sidedly interpret students' academic success or failure as the sole content and highest standard of student development, is not an isolated phenomenon. The crime rate of graduates, doctoral students and other highly educated people is higher than that of people with ordinary academic qualifications. This is because they pay too much attention to academic qualifications and knowledge and neglect the shaping and improvement of personality. A sound personality points us to the correct goal in life, and has Only by achieving the correct goal can we use the accumulated knowledge to create value in society. If the personality is incomplete or nonexistent, reading less will appear naive, and reading more will appear duller. Therefore, only by perfecting the personality can we make good use of the accumulated knowledge. Knowledge, so perfecting personality is more important than accumulating knowledge.

"Character determines a person's destiny" is a cliché, but it is indeed a truth. From my personal experience, I can tell that 90% of a person's success depends on his personality, what kind of person he is, and what kind of person he wants to be. Rather than being determined by the other ten percent of expertise. This certainly does not mean that a person with only 10% knowledge base will definitely have 90% development possibility. Personality is bricks, knowledge is cement, bricks are the foundation, but without cement, bricks cannot build a tall building.

If I were on the opposite side, I might refute you: There have been many people who, when the opportunity came to them with a smile, looked into their own eyes, but they couldn’t get it because they did not have enough professional knowledge and competent ability. Don't give up reluctantly.

Imagine that feeling of frustration. I have experienced this.

So it is best not to bring up topics like this when you are debating.

I have been quite busy these days, so I came late. Seeing that everyone has said everything that needs to be said, I don’t need to add any more details.

However, from a chicken-and-egg perspective, if the formation of personality is not innate but must be nurtured, then accumulating knowledge is more important than shaping personality. Without the accumulation of knowledge first, there is no way to shape personality. It can also be said that the process of making correct choices to accumulate knowledge is the process of shaping personality. When personality deviates from knowledge, it is usually due to improper selection of knowledge. So the key is whether you can choose knowledge correctly in the process of accumulating knowledge. If you choose correctly, personality shaping will not deviate. There is nothing wrong with knowledge. The problem lies in the system that uses knowledge structures.

Furthermore, the word "personality" needs to be clarified in its specific direction. The statement "shaping personality" itself has problems. What kind of personality is being shaped? Good personality or bad personality? Does personality mean the meaning of personality in psychology, or does it refer to the meaning of personality in theory? If there is confusion, the debate will be very different. Of course it cannot be referring to the so-called legal definition of personality. However, clarifying this meaning will help guide the direction of the debate.

Edit Quote

The purpose of people receiving education is to have a clearer understanding and get closer to the truth, and at the same time to strengthen their ability to control themselves, cultivate themselves, understand and transform the world. The mission of higher education is to cultivate senior professionals with innovative spirit and practical ability, develop science, technology and culture, and promote socialist modernization. Should college students focus on accumulating knowledge or shaping personality? Whichever is more satisfying the purpose of education and which is more in line with the tasks of higher education. Personality refers to an individual's moral quality, which is the sum of a person's temperament, ability, character and other characteristics. Obviously, the shaping of personality is based on the accumulation of knowledge. Reading hundreds of books will help you understand right and wrong. Only with a certain amount of knowledge accumulation can personality shaping be carried out

Yu Chu 'Chinese Debate Network' , I suggest Hongni MM to go there and have a look!

Scammers are rampant in society now, but the funny thing is: the ones who are the best at deception are no longer the little tricksters in the world - they are mostly people with high knowledge and intelligence and higher education; those who are deceived are also There are no longer low-educated people; on the contrary, the vast majority are highly educated people! They are a group of highly intelligent people in professional knowledge and imbeciles in social life. It is even common to see some highly intelligent people who have been deceived and cannot figure it out themselves, so they use deception to deceive other people. In the final analysis, cheating and being deceived are both tangible manifestations of personality distortion, which cannot be avoided by strengthening professional knowledge. Among the disciples of Master Li, there are not a few highly educated people, and distorted personality is only a manifestation of personality distortion. May exhibit pathological values.

If you read too few books, you will be simple but also ignorant; if you read too many books, you will become dull. But for personality, the weight of personality is extremely important for both high and low knowledge. People, first of all, must have a baseline of existence as a person in their hearts, only then can the word "person" be written more magnificently and elegantly. A person who has lost his personality or has always had a huge personality defect, no matter how good his professional knowledge is, he will not make much achievements. He will often go astray and go further, or he will die early on the way. The lives of these people cannot be considered a complete life, so their so-called "success" will completely lose its original meaning.

1) Although personality and knowledge are both important, in comparison, personality

is more important than knowledge. Therefore, we believe that in college, the biggest improvement should be in personality. Everyone here must still remember deeply the incident in which Tsinghua student Liu Haiyang injured a bear with sulfuric acid on February 23 this year. . . . . .

2) I think personality is more important than knowledge. Although knowledge and personality are both inherent things in people, in comparison, knowledge seems to be more superficial, while personality is a more essential thing. That is to say, a person's knowledge can be expressed in language, but personality can only be expressed in behavior. If a person has a noble personality but lacks some knowledge, he can be accepted by people. If a person is very knowledgeable but has a very trivial personality, such a person will only be despised by others.

In the "Red Mansions Case", how many optimistic and noble people fell. Weren't they rich in knowledge? Many of them have university diplomas, but why are they prisoners? Personality defect! Facing the temptation of money and beautiful women, they cannot control their conscience! The times are developing with each passing day, and the impact of the commodity tide is becoming more and more intense. In the "craze of going abroad" and the "craze of immigration", if we do not emphasize personality, I am afraid that in the near future, people will no longer be human, and the country will not be able to defeat it! Therefore, dear children of heaven, while accumulating knowledge and enriching your mind, don’t forget that it is more important to improve your personality and cultivate your conscience!

In current education, students' physical, mental, academic, and personality development are not harmonious enough, and there are very complicated reasons. But as far as education itself is concerned, to a large extent, it stems from the failure to effectively and scientifically coordinate the deep-seated contradictions between students' physical and mental, academic, and personality. In education, intentionally or unintentionally, the development goal is to simply improve students' academic level at the expense of students' physical and mental health and personality perfection; or one-sidedly understands students' academic success or failure as the only content and highest standard of student development. The tendency has not disappeared, nor is it an isolated phenomenon.

Evaluate students based on scores first, ignore students' physical and mental characteristics and physical and mental development levels, and train students into knowledge containers and examination machines; use academic and academic pressure to restrain students, and treat students' legitimate and healthy interests Turn a blind eye and tame students into submissive and obedient children in learning activities; judge heroes based on temporary academic success or failure, divide students into grades in terms of personality, favor a few students with excellent academic performance, and put other students into separate rolls, etc. Fundamentally speaking, deep-seated negative problems not only go against the purpose of educating people with quality education, but more seriously, they distort the relationship between students' physical and mental, academic and personality, and hinder the harmonious development of students. Because, regardless of students' physical and mental development level, they forcefully put pressure on students' academic performance; they do not respect students' personality, and even insult students' personality in order to obtain students' so-called academic progress; students are humiliated and even sacrificed physically and mentally due to slow academic development. Cost, etc., these phenomena show that once educational activities deviate from the track of harmonious development of students' physical, mental, academic, and personality, comprehensive education will inevitably transform into abnormal education.

These signs have caused the crime rate of highly educated talents such as graduate students and doctoral students to be higher than that of people with ordinary academic qualifications. This is because they pay too much attention to academic qualifications and knowledge and neglect the education of personality and moral quality, causing high Technology crime! The cause of high-tech crimes in all major systems is the cause and effect of personality shaping and imbalance of accumulated knowledge!

Of course personality is more important than knowledge

I only need to say one thing to defeat the opponent. If knowledge is important, why do so many knowledgeable people still end up in legal trouble when they make personality mistakes? , which is not tolerated by society! Haha

So, no matter how much knowledge one has, if he (she) does not have a healthy personality, then everything is "nothing"!!

A person's own moral quality is very important. It can reflect his cultivation.

Survival education is more importantly about shaping a more perfect personality. Of course, a perfect personality is inseparable from the accumulation of knowledge. The accumulation of knowledge should be an aspect of shaping personality, of course, if you look at it separately. I recommend reading a book called "Survival Education in America".

"Learn to survive" and "Learn to be a human being"

Everyone has seen a similar slogan in schools across our country: "Learn to be a human being, learn to live, learn to learn, learn to develop" "; or "Learn to be a human being, learn to survive, learn to seek knowledge, learn to develop"; or "Learn to be a human being, learn to do things, learn to create, learn to stay fit"; or "Learn to be a human being, learn to seek knowledge, learn to care, and learn to cooperate." No matter how things change, "Learning to be a good person" is always there, and it is always the first one. The slogans are said to come from UNESCO documents.

It is said that after subsequent verification, the above is just "rumored".

The education slogan proposed by the United Nations for the 21st century is: "Learning to be".

In China, "Learning to be" is translated as "learning to be a human being".

So can we use "learn to be a human being" instead of "learn to survive"?

According to reports, “Ji Hui, the host of Jiangsu Educational Television, wrote back and said that the English word for ‘learn to be a human being’ is ‘Be yourself’.

I said, what I want is not the English version of "Learn to be a human being", but the original text of "Learn to be a human being" in the UNESCO document. Soon, Ji Hui wrote again and found the original text, which came from the report "Education - The Wealth Contained in It" submitted to UNESCO by the International Commission on Education in the 21st Century in 1996, with former EU President Jacques Delors as director. The report proposed 'four learnings': Learning to know, Learning to do, Learning to live together, and Learning to be.

The definition of "survival" is: (a person or creature) to preserve life (as opposed to "death"). Isn't it a bit shocking to read it?

As for "being a human being" in Chinese. , the conventional "being a human being" has only two meanings: one is to treat others; the other is to be a decent person, who must live in a social group, and it is indeed difficult for people who do not know how to be a human being to "survive." ". However, people who don't know how to "be a human being" may include honest and kind people.

Even if "being a human being" is defined as: "being a decent person", can it be based on "learning how to be a human being" " instead of "learn to survive"?

No! Because we can always see many so-called decent people perish because they don't understand how to survive, right?

In order to "survive", just You must "learn to be a human being".

However, morality will always become the standard of "being a human being", so when "being a human being" is simply connected with "survival", it is very easy to devalue morality. p>

Of course, the Confucian theory of "being a human being" talks about how people should adapt to the social living environment. However, the traditional education of "being a human being" in adapting to the social environment also lacks something to keep pace with the times. Adaptability includes. Training and social skills also include physical and psychological endurance, as well as the ability to think independently, solve problems, apply knowledge, practice, create, etc...

So, "Survival education" and "life education" have emerged. The focus of the "three abilities" of physical fitness, skills, and intelligence should allow us to better distinguish between "survival education" and "life education"

(Compiled, most of the content comes from Huang Quanyu's "Survival Education in the United States")

This topic is well raised, difficult, and very similar to which is more important, EQ or IQ.

< p>Personality shaping is from the emotional aspect, and the scope can be very wide, extending to moral education, emotions, and humanistic things, focusing on thoughts; while accumulating knowledge is considered from the intellectual aspect, with an emphasis on skills.

Let’s start with the definition of personality: From a psychological perspective, personality is a unique integrated pattern of a person’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. This unique pattern includes a person’s stable and unified psychological quality that distinguishes him from others. < /p>

Personality includes two interrelated aspects: personal psychological characteristics and personality tendencies.

Personality and psychological characteristics include ability, temperament, and character. These psychological characteristics are affected by innateness to varying degrees. The influence of genetic factors is relatively stable. Personality tendencies include needs, motivations, interests, values, ideals, etc., which are mainly formed in the process of acquired socialization and reflect the unique side of human nature. Because personality is the unique behavior pattern, way of thinking and emotional response displayed by an individual in the process of interacting with the environment, therefore, if the individual can adapt to the social environment, he will have a normal personality. On the contrary, if an individual's emotional reactions, words and deeds, attitudes, belief systems and moral values ??are incompatible with the surrounding environment and interpersonal relationships are tense, he may suffer from a personality disorder.

Personality is a complex structural system that includes many components, of which temperament and character are the two most important aspects. Others include moral education.

1． Temperament

Temperament (temperament) is a stable psychological characteristic expressed in the intensity, speed, flexibility and directionality of psychological activities, which is what we usually call temper and disposition.

2． Character

Character (character) is a stable attitude toward reality formed in life and a habitual behavior pattern that is consistent with it. Einstein said that a person's career success depends on his great character.

A good character is the core content of a sound personality and a necessary condition for success in life.

Character is gradually formed in social life and is also affected by individual biological factors.

Then we can extend the problem to temperament, character, and ideological issues.

So what we need to discuss is whether it is more important to build a person with sound personality or to accumulate knowledge first.

Today's society has developed to a point where the norms of a civilized society in all aspects have been very sound. What should we do in the face of social challenges? What is our foundation? What demands does society place on us first?

1. We believe that personality is more important than knowledge. A sound personality is a need for the entire society. From a social perspective, the diversification of social value orientations has led to the diversification of people's value orientations. Just imagine, how can society believe that a person without a good personality can do good things? Will he be entrusted with important responsibilities? Therefore, the most important thing for us in society is to have a sound personality. First, be a good person. Being a good person is the foundation. If you cannot even be a good person, other things will be empty talk.

2. A sound personality is conducive to the accumulation of knowledge. If you are a person with a sound personality, then he will be sound in all aspects, have a good mentality, have a good attitude, and you will be able to expand your ideas and concentrate when you study. Learning efficiency will also be high. If a person has a grudge in his heart, he will worry about everything and always hold a grudge. How can he still learn through experience? For example, Einstein was a person with a sound personality, no selfish thoughts, and a very focused person. A sound personality is the prerequisite for accumulating knowledge, and the accumulation of knowledge is a necessity for a sound personality.

3. A sound personality is conducive to overall personal growth, family harmony, and social stability. On the other hand, if a person with an unhealthy personality leads society, how much harm will it bring to mankind? For example, Hitler had personality defects. It was his lack of humanity that caused a stain on history.

4. Shaping personality is a century-old achievement of cultivating people. For example, Zhou Enlai's perfect charisma inspired the enthusiasm of several generations and infected people in many countries around the world. His influence inspired admiration even among his enemies. The influence of Zhou Enlai's personality charm is far greater than his personal contribution. Because his personal knowledge was limited, his influence attracted a large number of people to embrace the motherland and dedicate everything to the country. Therefore, shaping personality is more important than accumulating knowledge.