Reject the prophet of doom! Why does Trump call for a variety of trees?

Tepran didn't appeal to all kinds of trees at all.

US President Trump went to Davos, and Swedish environmental protection girl Tumberg also went to Davos. There is no direct face-to-face communication between young people. However, Trump attacked the prophets of climate change and the concerns of the world, comparing them with those who worried about population explosion in the 1960s and famine in the 1970s, and called on corporate executives and ministers to refuse to predict that climate activists like Thonberg would become targets. Recently, this girl met many enemies in the Swedish climate event. When she arrived in the United States at the beginning of this month, she caught the attention of the right-wing authorities and subsequently triggered criticism from Trump. Conservative dining? De? Dinesh De Souza compared her image with Nazi propaganda posters, and a guest in the mainstream American media called her a Swedish child with mental illness who was used by her parents. Trump ridiculed her on Twitter as a happy young girl, looking forward to a bright future, and then eagerly described the bleak prospects of her generation in his speech. These are her latest attacks, but not the darkest or craziest. On the other hand, many of her supporters seem confused about why Sandberg caused these attacks.

They don't know what the environmental girl did wrong, and they are puzzled by her innocence. This skinny girl is wearing an oversized coat with hand-painted slogans. She insisted that we should follow the advice of scientists. There is no doubt that Thunberg's age and gender annoyed her critics, and she repeatedly emphasized the scientists' conclusions. Having said that, she thinks that their scientific predictions about the climate and the current economic and political order may not be consistent. A report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change last year warned that there is still 65,438+02 years to avoid irreversible climate damage.

Thunberg often mentioned this as a way to enhance motivation, like a time bomb strapped to the chest of her generation, counting down. The closer to zero, the more reason to take more radical action. Fundamentally speaking, this is a moral argument that the climate crisis is much more serious than solving any possible damage. Push this deadly clock forward, and anything that promotes it will be harmful. She thinks it has been touted for a long time? Green growth? Under this simple standard, models and market-based solutions are not feasible. She said at the United Nations Climate Conference held in Katowice last year that if it is difficult to find a solution in the system, then we should change the system itself.