Wuling recalled some Baojun models. What are the risks?

Wuling recalled some Baojun models. What are the risks? Why recall more than 900,000 cars? Do these Wuling cars have serious quality defects? In fact, this is not the case. It is worth noting that Wuling initiated the recall because some fuel ventilation hoses produced by suppliers may age and crack after long-term use. In extreme cases, when the fuel tank is full of fuel, fuel vapor may leak, which is likely to lead to fire and safety hazards.

Therefore, Wuling recalled the car and replaced the qualified fuel ventilation hose for free to eliminate potential safety hazards. You can rest assured that these cars have no major quality defects. But there is something wrong with the supplier. Wuling should pay more attention to this. After all, Baojun's propaganda slogan is "reliable partner", and enterprises have also practiced this slogan with practical actions, so the selection of suppliers should be more strict.

The products of SAIC-GM-Wuling have been recognized by many consumers for their high cost performance and high reliability. Baojun 730 and 560 are also two models with the title of "God Car" and have excellent body structure. C-NCAP crash test scores are all five stars, and the safety performance is really good. The recall of more than 900,000 730s and 560s seems to be a very serious car recall. In fact, this is the normal quality assurance process of SAIC-GM-Wuling, and it is not a serious fraud or quality defect.

We can compare the Takada airbag incident, which is the most serious incident in the world automobile industry. The counterfeit incident of Takada airbags has led to the recall of millions of cars around the world, and after their quality defect scandal was exposed, it triggered a global car recall. On the other hand, Takada's airbag fraud has been going on for many years.

If his fraud is not exposed, can he keep hiding it? Then millions of cars are equipped with airbags with potential safety hazards, which makes people think very carefully. If we continue to use these problematic airbags, then these vehicles, like time bombs, may endanger the lives of passengers one day. When there are problems with their products, enterprises do not want to solve them, but just hide them, which is irresponsible to consumers and even irresponsible to the reputation accumulated by their brands for many years.

On the other hand, the recall of SAIC-GM-Wuling is actually a benign quality assurance process. After detecting the risk of aging and cracking of suppliers' hoses, Wuling volunteered to recall, provide free maintenance and replace parts with potential safety hazards to prevent them from happening. It can be said that this is the embodiment of Wuling's responsibility to consumers, and it is the behavior that a conscientious and socially responsible enterprise should do, which is worthy of recognition.

Finally, I want to say a word to dispel everyone's prejudice. In the past, people always said "memories". In fact, not all car recalls are as bad as the Takada incident. As an effective means of quality assurance, recall is also the embodiment of automobile enterprises' responsibility to consumers, just like Wuling's recall. Of course, some procedures and processes of car recall are still a bit troublesome for ordinary car owners. I hope there will be fewer and fewer such things in the future.

At present, the progress of domestic independent automobile brands in all aspects is obvious to all, and they are getting better and better in automobile quality, design and after-sales guarantee. I hope they can continue to work hard to create cars with better appearance, better quality and higher cost performance for ordinary people. I also hope that everyone will be less prejudiced against their own brands and witness their growth and progress together!