SAAB 93 Vector 2.ts or Mitsubishi EVO, which has a better driving sense?

SAAB, of course. The slogan "People and cars flying close to the ground" is not just talk. I think you know their background well. The originator of turbocharging changed cars from building airplanes. You can also go to the SAAB land flight show. Compared with the rear drive, the front drive is almost drifting, but it is not a run, and it is useless to drive the rear. As for Mitsubishi EVO, Japanese cars, you are not afraid that one day, Japan will visit that abusive shrine again and spray slogans all over your car!

support you to buy SAAB!

support you to buy SAAB!

support you to buy SAAB!

about the concept of a car, what Europeans think is that I can't use it to cross Europe. What Americans think is that I drive from the east coast of America to the west coast and it works well. When the Japanese answered the China people's question about why everything was faulty after two years, they said, "In Japan, even if you live in a car every day, you will run 1, kilometers a year. Who would have thought that you would run 5 thousand kilometers a year! The Japanese changed cars after driving for three years. You have to drive for 15 years. Who do you blame? "What the Japanese want is to make the cab as thin as possible in order to save costs, as long as the engine room is weaker than the cab ―― so as not to directly kill people (the safety collision test can pass).