What is the position of China, the Organization for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons?

The United Nations has 193 Member States. China, the United States, Russia, Britain and France are the five permanent members of the United Nations, which have an important veto power. Apart from the five permanent members, they are also the most powerful economic and military forces.

draw

Over the years, the United Nations Security Council has initiated several draft resolutions, and the sovereign countries of the five permanent members often disagree. This phenomenon is usually manifested in major international military operations related to combat, and one of the five permanent members of the United States is also the country that uses one-vote veto most often. Usually, if one party has the veto, the current solution will not be passed on. However, in the recent United Nations vote, among the five permanent members, all parties rarely held the same attitude and voted against the resolution. And this resolution is the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which affects the nerves of the world.

draw

In fact, as early as 20 17, there were 122 countries among the United Nations Member States that voted to adopt the Treaty. The content of the treaty is that all countries with nuclear weapons must fully integrate nuclear weapons. Destruction will not continue research and development activities, which is undoubtedly the elimination of nuclear weapons on the earth. In a sense, the starting point of this resolution is good. After all, it is people's intention to maintain peace and avoid large-scale fighting. However, in the actual implementation process, it is inevitable to consider various related potential dangers. At that time, the five permanent members of the United Nations did not make a statement. In the follow-up work, the objection was finally raised on 20 18.

draw

During this period, international stakeholders repeatedly accused the P5 of not playing a role in the United Nations. At the same time, some analysts believe that in view of the current international situation, it is also very realistic for the P5 to unanimously veto. On the one hand, in the long run, the comprehensive prohibition of nuclear weapons will bring more benefits to the international community than benefits, and it is not easy to implement. After all, countries with nuclear rights have signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty with each other, and they have a clear understanding of the use of nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are more of a means to maintain strategic balance. The complete elimination of nuclear weapons will once again upset the long-term balance. The international situation will become uncontrollable and chaotic. Therefore, nuclear weapons can be withdrawn from the world stage before new restrictions appear. Strategy, not a one-size-fits-all approach.