Political problems: Everyone will die eventually, but we can't simply refuse to live and talk about why.

In the first half of this sentence, everyone will die eventually, and it is an objective fact. There is no reason or reason for this.

The second half is the key, but we can't simply refuse to live. Note that the emphasis here is very strict. It says you can't simply refuse to live. The key point of this sentence is "simply refuse", especially the simple three words. It shows that refusing life is not completely impossible or completely forbidden, because the prohibition itself cannot understand its reasons, so this sentence acquiesces that people can refuse life. But the point is that you can't simply decide to do it.

A person can weigh the pros and cons, weigh the significance and value of his existence, and give up living easily, which means losing everything he should have achieved easily. If such a practice is not worth the loss to someone, then his practice is naturally stupid. When I answered similar questions before, I also emphasized that many utopians have said that euthanasia should be allowed in an ideal country. Why not ban it? Because people have the right to choose their own comings and goings, no one can restrict the absolute freedom of others, otherwise they will interfere with the freedom of others at will for external reasons. It can be seen that the right to choose is your own, and what is said here is not to give up easily. So the pros and cons I said are necessary. For example, in the face of major disasters, when a person is facing extreme pain, euthanasia is not inhuman, but will show a humane side. This is entirely a personal choice. If asked in an extreme way, should people be restricted from committing suicide in the face of huge natural disasters? I think it is impossible to limit, because even if people persist in survival in the face of extremely huge disasters, the hope of survival is very slim. Such persistence is extremely painful, so the choice can only fall into the hands of individuals.