The dividend in the village is 5 million, which should be divided into 380 households or 4000 heads. What should I do?

If the accounts are divided, your village will be busy next year. Every household will be separated, children will go out independently, and the elderly will get another one alone. More shamelessly, the husband and wife are separated.

Therefore, it is recommended to divide according to the head.

The dividend in the village is 5 million, which should be distributed according to the population of 4,000. More accurately, it is reasonable to allocate the registered population according to the village where the police station is located, because the registered population is not in the village, so it does not enjoy all the substitutions in the village. thank you

Hello, I'm Iku Sita, and I'm glad to answer your question. As far as the current problem is concerned, is the dividend of 5 million in the village divided according to 380 households or 4000 people? If 380 households are counted, one household is about 13000 yuan, and if you divide it by 4000 people, one person can get 1250 yuan.

Personally, it is more reasonable to separate households. I think it is suggested to separate households by individuals, because many households will be divided into many households, and 380 households will become 760 or more. I think this kind of worry is unnecessary. First, if a family wants to open a new account, it must first go through the village Committee. For unreasonable account opening, the village Committee cannot directly pass. Second, the village committee can set a time period and pay dividends by households.

Then why do you think Tian's suggestion is based on households rather than heads?

First, the head count is really unpredictable, because there are 4,000 people in the village. Before 20 18, the village was considered a big village. First of all, if the old man dies after or during registration, will the money be counted? A new child is born, does it count? Does it count that the student's account moves out in a short time? There is a married daughter whose registered permanent residence has not moved out of the village for the time being. Do you count the people in the village? Is it considered that there are married people living in the village and their registered permanent residence has not been moved? Of course, there are many other unknown situations. In short, there will be many troubles and obstacles in registering. This is just one of them. Let me talk about the second one. The second is that the irrationality of dividing people by head lies in 380 households. The number of families in each household is definitely different. Zhang San's family even has more than 10, and Li Si's family may have only three people. Many families can get about 20 thousand, and a few families can only get less than 4000. It is unfair to divide the number of people in this way. Finally, it is a good thing that we are friendly neighbors and have no money. When the money is unreasonable, it is inevitable that people will curse each other for those who have nothing to do, why not die early. On the contrary, it hurts the harmony among villagers because of sharing money. If so, it is better not to divide.

On the other hand, it's much easier to divide households, and the amount of money for each household is the same, so there are not so many problems.

Therefore, to sum up, Yikusitian believes that it is most reasonable to distribute the 5 million dividends in the village to 380 households.

The dividend in the village is 5 million, calculated by 380 households with 4000 heads. According to my personal point of view, it can be divided into 4,000 heads, and the responsible person can also be divided into fields, or the population and fields can be divided into two parts, but not according to 380 households. I say this because: 1. According to the principle of 4000 people (existing number):

This 5 million should be obtained from the village collective land circulation or the village collective sideline. These 4000 people are all villagers in the village. Whether freshmen, newlyweds or hard work, they should enjoy the benefits that villagers should enjoy.

The profit-making projects in the village are for the benefit of the villagers. If you are a villager in the village, you can't enjoy the welfare of the villagers. What a pity!

2. The principle of dividing the population according to the responsible fields.

It was really a great responsibility to assign responsibility from the field to people in those days. Agricultural taxes and other miscellaneous fees are nearly 10 every year, and there are many tolerances such as river-lifting, traffic prevention, river digging and road repair.

The number of people divided into fields was the most reasonable at that time. Since the land can remain unchanged for 30 years, the countryside can also be used as the basis for villagers to enjoy dividends.

3. The principle of equal distribution of population and land area.

This is a compromise, which takes care of the feelings of people who divide the land and those who are newly born and married.

Because now people are born, married, and want to live. Since it is a recent dividend, it is reasonable to take care of the life of the new population. Who dares to say that if you don't pick up your daughter-in-law, you will add grandchildren in the future?

4. Reasons for not dividing by 380 households

380 households are not the same population. Some may have only one person and two people, and many may exceed 10. If it is divided by households, that is to say, 1 household or 2 households will also receive as much dividends as 8 households or 10 households. Are fund-raising, tax payment and business trip shared by households?

If it is not shared by households, then no matter from which aspect, it can not be justified by reason. At the beginning, I didn't make more contributions. Why can one person get the same bonus as so many others?

So I think we can divide the dividend according to 4000 heads, or according to the number of people in charge of the field, or according to the number and area, but not according to 380 households, because that would be too uneven. Hello, everyone. Regarding the distribution of dividends or money in the village, whether it is divided by households or by heads, let me share the situation in our village.

For households, it is difficult to separate households now. For newly-married families, most of them still stay with their parents in the same household and will not be separated for the time being, forming a big family. If dividends are distributed by households, it is relatively unfair to such families. Then, they don't agree to divide by households, but prefer to divide by heads.

However, according to the head count, families with large population get more, and families with relatively small population are unbalanced. They will oppose this division and support the division by households, because it will get the greatest benefit.

So no matter how it is divided, in a big village with 380 households, it is impossible to satisfy everyone. This will lead to contradictions and everyone will be dissatisfied. This is the hardest!

Remember when we built a tomb in Tomb-Sweeping Day as a tombstone? At that time, I just got married and had a son. At that time, I had not followed my parents separately. When it was time to check out how much each household paid, they counted me in. In the past two years, they have always said that I count as a family.

I argued with him that it didn't matter to give the money. If you really don't like me and say I'm a household, I'll throw the household registration book in front of it and say, come on, help me divide the household, I can't divide it. It's so simple in your mouth, you can help me divide it. His face is blue!

I gave him advice. In these ethnic groups, it is everyone's responsibility to spend money on things. To be a little fairer, calculate the money according to men. It is most appropriate for men to pay. Don't insist on how to calculate every year.

Of course, your situation is different from mine. I suggest you all do it, discuss how to divide it, find a suitable division, and don't make conflicts. Whether it is a household or a head should be discussed collectively in the village, not by the village head alone.

There is no doubt about how to do this problem. Because how to pay dividends, there must be regulations in the specific village, and this regulation must not be groundless.

But personally, I think that since it is dividends, it involves investment in shares. If you don't invest in stocks, there will be no dividends, so there will be no dividends.

Not buying shares is welfare, and welfare should be based on the head.

We usually divide it according to the head here.

1. A married woman is not from her village as long as she is married, regardless of whether her household registration has changed.

2, married daughter-in-law, or door-to-door son-in-law, as long as married, regardless of whether the account has moved in.

No matter how old you are, everyone has an average score.

Does everyone have to have a fair share?

After the development of village collective economy, economic income can be distributed to villagers in the form of dividends, but a reasonable distribution plan needs to be formulated before distribution. Because the final distribution plan needs to be submitted to the villagers or villagers' representative meeting for discussion and decision before it can be implemented, the village Committee needs to come up with the distribution plan in advance.

If you don't come up with the distribution plan in advance and hold a meeting to discuss it, everyone may argue endlessly at the meeting, and it is difficult to form a * * * understanding and reach an agreement. The final result is that the meeting cannot form a resolution, which will affect the villagers' dividends.

So when the village Committee takes the plan, does it choose the plan of 380 households or the plan of 4000 heads? I think it is the fairest and most reasonable to choose the scheme of 380 households, because it will not involve the problem of family population, so it will not lead to the problem of large family population and small family population, and it is the fairest distribution scheme.

However, according to the division of households, it may lead to the problem of arbitrary household division. Therefore, it is necessary to set the rules in advance, and clearly tell everyone which situations can be divided into households and which situations cannot be divided into households. Even if households are divided, they cannot participate in dividends, so as to avoid the problem of participating in dividends at will.

Why not divide it among 4000 people? Because the population is changing at any time, what if there are 4000 people today and a new population is born tomorrow? Give points regardless? A man died yesterday. Do you give points or not?

Some people may say, whether the population is increasing or decreasing, isn't it enough to adjust once a year? Adjust once a year, once it needs to be adjusted every year, it will increase the work intensity; Secondly, it will cause everyone to leave their hukou in the village, so that there will be more and more people in the future and the average money in front of everyone will be less and less.

Through the above comparison, it is found that household is the simplest and most fair and reasonable distribution scheme. Therefore, the village can come up with specific plans according to this idea, and submit them to the villagers or villagers' representatives for discussion and decision on the basis of soliciting opinions, and they can be implemented after a resolution is formed.

Shuangqing and three rural counterparts in the village will receive a dividend of 5 million. Will it be divided into 380 households or 4000 people? What should I do? -to convene a meeting of villagers' representatives to discuss and decide on the distribution plan. Please see below for details.

The author once worked in the rural grassroots, and gave money to farmers a few years ago to answer the questions of the Lord.

The main topic is to pay dividends to the villagers in the village. I don't know whether to divide them by account or by head. According to the working policy of the higher-level government on rural affairs, when encountering major problems, it is not necessary for several leading members of the village to sit in the office and think of ways, but it is necessary to hold a meeting of villagers' representatives to discuss and pass according to procedures. This work plan must be approved by more than two-thirds of the villagers' representatives before it can be put into practice.

The subject is mainly to pay dividends to the villagers in the village, and it is also a major work project. It is necessary to hold a meeting of villagers' representatives in the whole village to discuss and decide on the distribution plan. Fully listen to the opinions of villagers' representatives, brainstorm and finally achieve democratic centralism. This not only conforms to the work policy of superiors, but also conforms to the wishes of most villagers, avoiding contradictions and making the work passive. No matter whether it is divided into 380 households or 4000 households, there will be no big contradiction.

As village cadres, they represent the interests of villagers and exercise their rights. When exercising their power, they must follow the work instructions of the higher government, fully listen to the wishes of the villagers, respect their democratic rights, play the role of democratic supervision, and better serve the villagers.

In recent years, in view of the contradiction between village cadres and villagers all over the country, in order to create a harmonious and stable social environment, the state has issued a series of documents to regulate the behavior of rural grassroots cadres. The subject doesn't need to worry about dividing the population into 380 households or 4000 households, just follow the work instructions of the higher government. It can not only avoid unnecessary distress, but also make the work go smoothly and satisfy most villagers.

Welcome to leave messages, welcome to communicate, and become attached to agriculture, countryside and farmers.