A parking space bought by a woman in Zhengzhou for 79,000 yuan disappeared out of thin air. What did the developer do?

The developer changed the location of the parking space without telling Ms. Qi, so it is entirely possible for her to ask the developer to return the parking space or change the parking space, because the developer violated the contract and failed to inform her in time after the location of the parking space originally sold to Ms. Qi was changed. Later, the company only used mechanical parking spaces to fool her. The location of this parking space is not very good, which has brought difficulties to Ms. Qi's travel and made Ms. Qi feel very bad, so Ms. Qi asked to return or replace the parking space.

At that time, when the parking space was sold, the developer's floor plan showed the specific location where Ms. Qi bought the parking space, and Ms. Qi bought it when she felt good. After delivery, Ms. Qi found that the original location has become a wall, and the theory of finding a real estate center is the original picture of the developer. They just sold the parking space according to this, and didn't change this map. Someone in charge said it was a size drawing, not a final rendering, but because of the black-and-white contract,

At the time of delivery, the parking space that Ms. Qi originally liked and bought disappeared and became a wall. The developer compensated Ms. Qi with the mechanical parking space, but this made her very uncomfortable, because the mechanical parking space was not conducive to her parking. The developer violated the contract and provided a map that was not in line with the actual situation. She signed a contract with Ms. Qi and Ms. Qi also paid the money. The developer changed the parking space plan without authorization, which brought inconvenience to Ms. Qi, and the actual parking space position was inconsistent with the parking space sold at that time.

Ms. Qi can take up legal weapons, sue the developer, let him continue to perform the contract, or make some compensation. If there is evidence to prove that the developer cheated at the beginning, she can sue them for contract fraud and demand a refund of one and a compensation of three, so that the developer can accept the legal judgment, thus reducing the occurrence of such fraud and being of great benefit to maintaining market order. After all, developers will inevitably converge after learning the lesson.