Why Unicom and Telecom are not as good as Mobile?

Two-thirds of China's mobile phones choose mobile, and one-third choose Unicom.

The analysis has the following reasons:

1, China Unicom is a new mobile operator. When GSM began to operate the numbering system, the first impression was that there were many signal blind spots. After the completion of the multi-phase project, GSM signals have basically reached seamless coverage, meeting the requirements of general civil communication, but there are still differences compared with mobile. China Unicom mainly invested in CDMA boutique network, so GSM has reached such a level. Therefore, in terms of GSM signal coverage, Unicom may be weaker than mobile.

2. The mobile network has early numbering and many users. Most people in China follow the crowd, so it seems a bit different to use Unicom by themselves. What's more, because the one-way charging is carried out on the mobile network, and the other party from China Unicom is unwilling to answer the phone, which is inconvenient.

3. China Mobile introduced more preferential tariff measures than China Unicom, which made the mobile tariff lower than that of China Unicom. Nominally, the tariff of China Unicom is 10% lower than that of China Mobile. Various mobile activities give new and old users some discounts by giving away phone bills and recharging discounts, which firmly trap users.

4. Unicom's CDMA signal has dared to compete with mobile now, but CDMA is only more favorable for big customers, and there is no people's card, public card and the like for ordinary people, and there is no such preferential treatment as free monthly rent. Monthly subscription is more favorable, but it can't be widely used by most ordinary people. CDMA mobile phones have few varieties, high prices and high tariffs, so it is difficult to popularize them among ordinary people, and relying solely on big customers can not bring greater profits to China Unicom.