Argumentative essay on "Seeing is believing". Require more than 8

After listening to incredible stories, many people will say, "Seeing is believing, but hearing is not." But seeing is really believing, but listening is really not? According to people's practice, it will be said that this is true. For example, we often see amazing magic tricks. People are staring at the performance. When they look at the performer, the audience's eyes show admiration and surprise. When they look at the performer, they really turn out the item. But is it reasonable to believe with that sight? Is it really his turn? For another example, some of us always like to read the extracurricular books, most of which are love novels. Most of the plots inside are that two people are fighting for one person, and the other person is jealous of the feelings of those two people, so they create an illusion to change the feelings of that lover. After seeing the illusion, the hero or heroine will be sad and hate that person. When we see this, our readers or viewers will be filled with emotion, but it also proves that what we see is not necessarily true. It is also a phrase that people often use, but it also has some extremes. For example, we often look at the Dienis Book of World Records, and people are surprised that the challengers put forward their own goals, but in the end, it turns out that the challengers all achieved them. When we recall that this sentence is empty, will people have another understanding of it? We don't know how many times we have heard the phrase "seeing is believing, but hearing is not believing", and how long it has been circulating. Is it still a classic for today's society? I believe the answer lies in your heart and mine. You should know not to trust your eyes in everything and not to trust your ears in everything. It is easy to make mistakes when spreading. For example, there were no newspapers and televisions in ancient times, so there was always a big difference when news spread from one place to another. Also, if Kyle Polo had never been to China, how could he write his travel notes? Even if he did, how many people would believe him?