Appreciation of the main idea of the original text and paragraphs

"Takeism" is a humorous language form of modern writer Lu Xun, which expresses an idea of attacking current politics and challenging power. It is an essay that dares to analyze culture and understand history.

China has always been a so-called "closed door". If he doesn't go, no one else is allowed to come. Since the door was broken by a gun, it has been hit with a string of nails. Up to now, everything has become "farewell doctrine" If nothing else, I just sent a batch of antiques to Paris for exhibition recently. I don't know what will happen after that. There are also several "masters" holding several ancient paintings and new paintings and hanging them all the way in European countries, which is called "carrying forward the national light". I heard that Dr. Mei Lanfang will be sent to the Soviet Union to promote "symbolism" in the near future, and then he will go to Europe to preach. I don't want to discuss the relationship between Dr. Mei's acting skills and symbolism here. In short, living people have replaced antiques, and I dare say it is a little progress.

But none of us said according to the ceremony of "reciprocity": bring it!

Of course, it is not a bad thing to give it away directly. A person is rich in knowledge, and a person is knowledgeable. Nietzsche boasted that he was the sun, with infinite light and heat, just giving and not wanting. However, Nietzsche is not the sun after all. He's crazy. Neither is China, although some people say that underground coal is enough for the world to use for hundreds of years. But, hundreds of years later? Hundreds of years later, of course, we will become souls, or go to heaven or go to hell, but our children and grandchildren are still alive, so we should leave them some gifts. Otherwise, on the occasion of the festival ceremony, they get nothing, so they have to kowtow to each other and ask for some leftovers as a reward.

This kind of reward should not be misunderstood as throwing things. It was thrown away. To put it mildly, it can be called "sending". I don't want to give examples here.

I don't want to say "send" here, otherwise it will not be "modern". I just want to advocate that we should be more stingy, not only "send", but also "bring" for "bring".

But we were frightened by what was delivered. First, British opium, abandoned guns in Germany, then French gunpowder, American movies, and various Japanese gadgets printed with "completely domestic products". Therefore, even sober young people are disgusted with foreign goods. In fact, this is precisely because it is "sending" rather than "bringing".

So use your head, open your eyes and get it yourself!

For example, there is a poor young man among us who got a big house because of the evil deeds of his ancestors (let's just say so), whether he was cheated, robbed, legally inherited or as a son-in-law. So, what should we do? I think, first of all, regardless of the willy-nilly, "bring it"! However, it would be a shame to oppose the old owner of this house and hesitate to enter the door for fear that his things will be dirty; When you fly into a rage and set it on fire, you can save your innocence, but you are stupid. But because I envy the old owner of this house, this time I accepted everything, jumped into the bedroom happily, smoked the remaining opium, and of course it was even more wasteful. "Usualism" is completely different.

He has and chooses. When you see shark fin, you don't just throw it on the road to show its "popularity". As long as it is nutritious, you can eat it with your friends like radish and cabbage, but don't use it to entertain big guests; When you see opium, you won't throw it into the toilet in public to see its complete revolution. You just send it to the drugstore for treatment, but you don't create the mystery of "while stocks last" Only pipes and lanterns, although different from India, Persia and Arabia, can really be regarded as the quintessence of China. If you travel around the world with it on your back, someone will surely see them, but I think everything can be destroyed except sending some to museums. There are still a group of concubines who want to ask them to separate, otherwise "takenism" may be a bit dangerous.

Anyway, we must take it with us. We want to use it, store it, or destroy it. Then, if the owner is a new owner, the house becomes a new one. However, first of all, this person should be calm, brave, discerning and not selfish. Without it, you can't be a newcomer. Without bringing it, literature and art can't become new literature and art.

The paragraph 1 ~ 2 of "Takeism" mainly exposes the performance of "Takeism" in learning arts and the flattery of its promoters, and puts forward "Takeism" against blind "sending away".

Paragraph 3-5: Focus on exposing the relationship between the sender and the slave owner, distinguish the difference between "vote" and "vote", and put forward "take doctrine".

Paragraphs 6-7: Focus on exposing the true face of "giver", draw a clear line between "taking" and "sending", and put forward the gist of "taking" (use your head, open your eyes, and take it yourself).

Paragraph 8 ~ 10: Criticize three wrong attitudes towards cultural heritage, point out that "takenism" should regard cultural heritage as "possession", "choice" and creation, and finally draw a conclusion.

The appreciation of the article "Takeism" is aimed at the capitulationism of the national government that worships foreign things and sells national cultural heritage, and at two wrong tendencies within the revolutionary literary and art front, namely, the "Left" error of cutting off history and completely denying it, and the right error of falling at the feet of foreigners and advocating total absorption. The works are profound in thought, unique in opinion, sharp-edged and aggressive, which makes people have to marvel at Mr. Lu Xun's exquisite language art.