Why is it cruel to kill cats? Unforgettable And it's normal to kill chickens and ducks. Isn't that hypocrisy?

It is ok to kill cats and dogs, after all, they are raised by people (not wild) and used by people. But killing cats and dogs is not allowed, because even if they are used, it is completely unnecessary and unreasonable. This is not a question of hypocrisy, this is a question of morality!

I'm afraid to see those innocent eyes.

They are simple, naive and cowardly. But human beings have mastered the power to kill them, and with the rules of the food chain in the biological world, who can sing sad songs can change anything? Although I don't like eating meat very much, I know that not eating meat affects my health, and it is also against the laws of nature not to kill.

It is often said that you should pray a few words before killing chickens and ducks: don't be annoyed, don't complain, you are a dish on the earth. In primitive society, human beings can hunt and kill, and naturally need ecological balance. Talent is the top of the real food chain, and everything you eat is alive. Feel red blood, fear, awe and cruelty. Isn't it an inner worry not to be afraid of a living familiar person but to be afraid after the death of this familiar person? Personal beliefs and cognition are different and cannot be generalized.

Cats and dogs are spiritually intelligent, but chickens, ducks and ordinary fish are almost spiritually intelligent, especially plants, and some may be, but we humans hardly feel spirituality. So killing chickens, ducks, fish and plants is not cruel, but mental animals are different. Can you still drink the northwest wind without eating anything?

Cats and dogs have emotional sustenance for most human beings. They can bring happiness, companionship and comfort to human beings, especially dogs can watch the door and bring people a sense of security. After a long time, you will naturally have feelings. It seems that no one keeps flies, mosquitoes, cockroaches and mice as pets. This is the essential difference.

Many people or even all people do normal things, such as killing mosquitoes, filming cockroaches, butchers killing pigs and so on. But what only a few people or even one person do will be criticized by the public!

Slogan put forward by dog lovers: Everything is animistic and life is equal. I would like to ask dog lovers, in your eyes, except dogs, are all life equal? Also, don't love, please don't hurt this slogan. Besides dogs and cats, what are other life in your eyes?

Such as pigs, cows, sheep, horses, donkeys, chickens, ducks, geese and other animals. According to the dead-end theory, slaughterhouse workers are the worst people? Even people who kill chickens, ducks and fish as their profession, I am afraid it is impossible to scald pregnant cats with boiling water. Some areas in Southeast Asia will kill cats by eating cat meat, but this is not the same as cat abuse. Killing small animals for no reason seems to have no purpose, but the actual purpose is terrible and not hypocritical at all. I believe that most people have a steelyard in their hearts.

There is no strict boundary between companion animals and food animals, and ducks and geese can also be companion animals.

I have read a novel before. An old lady's son is unfilial. She ran away from home by herself, with only a goose beside her. So this goose is also the companion animal of the old lady, but it does not mean that all geese are the companion animals of the old lady, or that all geese are the companion animals of human beings. As long as it is not a cruel death, there is nothing wrong with killing legal animals through formal channels to obtain meat. In some areas, raising vegetable dogs and selling dog meat to get rid of poverty are also effective characteristic industries based on regional characteristics. Dog meat can also be eaten and dogs can be killed. As long as it is not abuse, it is ok to legally kill people through formal channels.

The key is the starting point. If you just eat for survival, that's ok, and there is nothing wrong with it. But if you have an immoral starting point, it is anti-human and immoral. If you have no conscience, you are unworthy. What's the difference with the devil?

There are always many tricks, so this time, it is essentially different to confuse killing chickens, ducks and crabs with killing cats. The purpose of killing chickens and ducks is to satisfy appetite, and killing cats is to enjoy the killing process. Can this be the same? If the cat killer subjectively wants to eat cats, it will never cause such great concern. It has nothing to do with whether it is a cat or not. At most, it is similar to the application of people who love cats (dogs), and it will not make most people hostile as it is now.

It is acceptable to kill for meat. I have seen a video of cooking before, and I burned the bamboo rat alive before cooking. Although I can't accept it, there is nothing to condemn. The anchor is a chef, saying that it is not easy to slaughter, it is not easy to shed hair after scalding, and the slaughter process is also very fast. People want to eat meat, and chefs also feed their families by slaughtering and cooking. This is human nature, and it is not the same as cruelty.

What is the relationship between cats as pets and unforgivability?

If a person has no restraint on cruelty, then he is a real villain, and the same is true for people! Do you think it's cute that cats play with dead mice or birds?

Anyway, I like watching it very much, and the more I watch it, the more I think cats are cute. ?

I've seen cats kill their own kind. Dagong cats will kill their cubs in order to mate with female cats with cubs. If they have enough time, they will even treat their kittens like mice. This kind of incident is not uncommon. Male cats who are basically not sterilized will do it, and male cats in estrus will choose to find female cats. I think the behavior of male cats is more excessive than that of cat abusers. How would you feel if that man tortured a male cat to death? ?

Even if you say that cat abusers are not people and cats are not people, there are always people who love cats far more than virtuous people, right? I am. No matter how noble your moral character is, as long as you are not related to me, I will definitely love cats that are not related to me. Civilization is that there is no law against it. A high degree of civilization is based on the rule of law, which means judging right and wrong by emotions. This is a barbaric act of a completely barbaric society.

If the cat meat is delicious, it will be treated like a chicken or a duck. Cats, the hunters at the top of the food chain, have a great negative impact on the ecological balance if there are too many, because almost all animals smaller than them are its prey. Support the killing of stray cats and tax breeders.

I think it is the following:

1, the cruel process is cruel, which is the main problem of this incident;

2. The indiscriminate killing for the purpose of survival is also cruel;

It is wrong to steal other people's pets illegally, even for survival. It should be more rigorous. Actually, Sister Xian is right. You can understand if you can understand. If you can't understand, forget it. In fact, you know your own judgment without explanation. If you don't think killing cats is cruel, you won't accept anything I say. Actually, I don't need to say it.

The purpose of feeding is different. Chickens and ducks are raised to eat, and they are regarded as food from the beginning, and they will not cultivate feelings with them. Cats and dogs exist as pets, not as food, and will establish feelings with them. People are influenced by feelings. If something with feelings can be used as food, it would be a little scary. Some people say that it is hypocritical for cows, horses and donkeys to be eaten so hard. As I said before, look at the purpose of feeding. At first, it was regarded as a working animal or food. Cows, horses and donkeys, which are generally regarded as working, will not eat (only a few will). I have been exposed to these things since I was a child, and everyone will treat them well and will not eat them when I die. Generally, horses, donkeys and donkeys are defined as food from the beginning, not jobs.

Aren't all the chickens, ducks, cattle and sheep we eat bought in the supermarket?

There is a formal slaughter process for killing cattle and sheep. Go and see the place where dogs are killed. It's just a place where evil spirits are rampant. Cat abuse is to attract attention, and to twist the mind in a cruel way to get attention.

Killing chickens and sheep is to satisfy appetite. Most people kill animals and prey on wild animals in order to enjoy high quality food. Me too. Many of my favorite foods are cooked cruelly, such as drunken shrimp, drunken goose, fresh sashimi and so on. So people are cruel, and those who are not cruel are one in a million. It's just that the cruel way and purpose are different. We're all the same. We're all bitches. We just can't see each other clearly. Be strict with yourself and be lenient with others.

Everyone understands it differently, so you don't have to impose your will on others. Actually, you are a hypocrite. My personal opinion is that putting aside all sensibility, Darwin's natural selection and survival of the fittest are the reasons and methods for the progress of human civilization!

Only human beings are supreme and other animals are inferior! Don't deny the animality and inferiority of some animals just because they are close to people! Being recognized as a companion animal has also changed the definition of providing meat for human beings, but now there are more meats to choose from and fewer cats and dogs to eat. In fact, cats and dogs, like pigs, cows, sheep, chickens, ducks and geese, provide meat for human beings.