How would you rate yourself when asked in an interview? How would you answer?

How do you answer when asked in an interview how you evaluate yourself?

How do you answer when asked in an interview how you evaluate yourself? Interviews are very important in the job search process because you want to find a job you like. Your job requires skills during the interview, and there is a part of evaluating yourself during the interview. Below I will share how you would evaluate yourself when asked during the interview, and how you would answer. Let’s take a look.

How would you rate yourself when asked in an interview? 1

1. Grasp the scale. Interview self-evaluation is to present your good side concisely in front of the recruiter and let him be "heartbeat" for you. But be careful not to brag about yourself as "superior". Excessive bragging will arouse the other party's resentment.

2. It has its own characteristics. If every candidate's self-evaluation is the same: I am cheerful and optimistic, with a spirit of cooperation... the recruiter will not listen to it, and he will not be interested in speaking. How do you say it has personal characteristics? It's very simple, just describe yourself in your own words!

3. Match the job position. Recruiters will ask you to conduct a self-evaluation because they want to know your understanding of yourself and the positions the company is currently recruiting for, and how well you match the positions.

Therefore, when evaluating yourself during an interview, you need to highlight your comprehensive qualities and characteristics to the company, which mainly include strengths such as personal qualities, work skills and expertise, and should also include weaknesses such as personal shortcomings.

Personal strengths

Any experience, skills, knowledge, achievements, etc. should be highlighted, because these are the most important factors for a successful interview. When highlighting these advantages, you should also find out what makes you different from other candidates to form your personal advantages and leave a unique impression on the recruiter.

For your own advantages, you can analyze them from the following perspectives:

Knowledge. What did you learn from the professional courses? How is knowledge constituted? What knowledge did you gain from your past job? What knowledge is obtained from what sources? When doing self-evaluation, you can explain it clearly.

Experience. What work experience do you have? What kind of life experiences have you had? What projects have you done and what experience have you gained? When doing self-analysis, you must be good at using past experience choices to infer future work directions and opportunities.

Results. What have you done that was successful? You may have done many things, but what was successful, and which one was the most successful? Why is it successful? Is it accidental or inevitable? Through analysis, you can discover the superior aspects of your personality, such as strength and decisiveness, which can be used as a source of motivation and a shining point of personal charm for deep exploration.

Personal Weakness Analysis

No one is perfect. In addition to personal strengths, interview self-evaluation should also talk about personal shortcomings, and know your own shortcomings so as not to let yourself down. Be blindly confident and arrogant; analyze your own disadvantages so that you will not feel inferior and dejected for no reason because of your disadvantages. Similar to strengths analysis, weaknesses can be analyzed from the following perspectives:

Lack of knowledge. A person's knowledge, whether theoretical or technical, cannot be 100% mastered. In addition to this major, it is impossible to fully know other knowledge. But at least you have to show that you have this understanding and your determination to continue learning.

Character weakness. No matter how good a person is, he will always have his own weaknesses, whether he is too strong, too cowardly, or too mediocre. Weaknesses in character only appear real. Only when you have a correct understanding, take them seriously, and try your best to find ways to make up for and overcome them, so as to improve yourself.

Lack of experience. Maybe you have failed many times and just can't find a shortcut to success; you need to do a certain job that you have never been exposed to before, which shows a lack of experience. The lack is not scary. What is scary is that you haven’t realized it yet and just pretend to understand.

Interview self-evaluation sample:

In terms of work, I have great enthusiasm for mobile Internet promotion. I have been a WeChat operator for a year and have some experience in mobile Internet promotion. I am good at planning, data collection and copywriting, and have written several articles with a reading conversion rate of over 100. In terms of personality, I am generally optimistic, and because I study and work abroad all year round, I am also relatively independent, but sometimes I am still weak. , especially when talking about something on the phone with family members. How do you evaluate yourself when asked in an interview? 2

How do you evaluate your past in a job interview?

Question 1: What shortcomings do your former colleagues think you have?

Reference answer: This is a way for interviewers to detect the shortcomings of job applicants. When job seekers answer such questions, they must answer some shortcomings that are not closely related to the job. For example, my colleagues commented that I am too enthusiastic. These shortcomings, which are not shortcomings, are actually advantages to job seekers. Because it sends a message to the interviewer from the side: the applicant is enthusiastic and cheerful.

Question 2: How do you evaluate the unit you worked for in the past?

Reference answer: The third question is a very dangerous question. On the one hand, it may be intended to test whether your personality is sound. Some people, who are mentally retarded, always like to make irresponsible remarks behind their backs, gossip, and talk about people. This is very undesirable. No serious unit will absorb those who can bring unnecessary trouble and trouble to work. Increase interpersonal costs for employees. Here, only factual judgments should be made about past units - such as the nature of the enterprise, scope of business, personnel composition, etc., without involving business secrets such as its operating conditions, and try to avoid value judgments - such as whether its business ideas are correct and whether its employment is appropriate. , whether the relationship is harmonious, whether the customers are picky, whether the prospects are promising, whether the boss is outstanding, etc. You know, criticizing others is often taboo. But, on the other hand, this may be because this unit is spying on business intelligence. After knowing the units you have worked for from your resume, it is trying to understand all aspects of its competitors, marketing strategies, and personnel composition based on the information you provided. , product prices, development strategies, publicity and advertising, interpersonal relationships, customer materials, core portfolio, salary standards, supply and demand conditions, channel construction, management design, peripheral support and so on. This kind of intelligence spying is a worldwide problem, but you have no right or obligation to provide this kind of information, and this unethical attempt should be carefully considered from the perspective of whether it is suitable for you to work here in the future. .

Question 3: Do you think you had any shortcomings or flaws in your previous job?

Reference answer: Generally, this kind of question often arises in interviews in some small-scale units. It does not have a humanitarian spirit and respect for people. When answering this kind of question, in addition to the obvious external conditions such as experience, age, education, gender, foreign language, major, etc., you can slightly transform your own advantages. For example, the opposite of seriousness is a bit exciting, and the opposite of quickness is eagerness. The opposite of seeking merit and being upright is simplification in dealing with interpersonal relationships, the opposite of loyalty is being unsociable, etc. Under normal circumstances, such issues do not play a decisive role.

Question 4: How do you evaluate your boss?

Reference answer: This question is encountered by many candidates during interviews, because interviewers hope to understand whether the candidates have gotten along harmoniously with their bosses through such questions. Back to this question, it is best to use some pertinent words to evaluate your boss. For example, he is a workaholic but not impersonal, he is serious but not funny.