What are the characteristics of armchair strategist at work and how to deal with them?

A: This kind of person is unrealistic and can only talk big, but it is also a coincidence that he didn't learn much from this kind of person because he didn't practice it. This kind of person is still as far away as possible.

It's my opinion of people who can only talk on paper at work.

Coincidentally, both my company and my girlfriend's company have such a person. Perhaps this is also an essential feature of each unit. !

Tell me about the comrade in my unit: to tell the truth, a person who can talk on paper must have some merits. However, he turned his advantage into a natural egg by covering his face with his mouth. Influenced by his elders, this comrade is very worldly and flattery. Knowing the emergence of "larded school", from a high school student to the top of the unit, has been highly valued by the leaders from the beginning. However, due to carelessness in the abdomen, I usually don't strengthen my study, but I leave rhetoric everywhere. In practical work, I made a fool of myself and won't do anything when I am on the top! Finally, the leaders looked down, and colleagues looked down!

Get along with such people, don't refuse, don't take the initiative, don't make friends! Don't completely stay away from him just because you despise him, because he will be full of nonsense, rude and shameless. He will "put in a good word" in front of the leader, and once or twice, the leader may not be at ease. If he talks too much, it's really fake!

Because everyone's growth environment and education level are different, such people can be seen everywhere in society. As an experienced person, I warn you: No matter how straight your intestines meet such people, you must remember to turn a corner, so as not to make yourself chicken feathers all over the floor!

All in all, in a word, the word "golden mean" is right at that time!

There are a lot of empty words, only talking about the program and not talking about practical issues.

In short, every speech is the same old story, and it's always those few words over and over again, like monks chanting scriptures and actors reciting lines.

Therefore, the work has not achieved any results.

Such a person really has no good way, because there is nothing wrong with his speech. People say "classic" sentences, how can they find fault?