Gentlemen of the East Eighth District: Why does a play offend both men and women?

There are four leading men-the person in charge of a company that is developing artificial intelligence and autonomous driving in their thirties, an associate professor of a prestigious school in their thirties, a manager of a luxury store in their thirties, well-dressed and even proposed by a rich woman's client ... As for the plot, in the first episode, four leading men, including Tong Yu, were parachuted into the scene by helicopter, and the bridesmaids at the scene were all women of different colors, and the party place after the wedding was in the pool. Writer, this is suspended into outer space.

With the change of female audience's aesthetic taste and love concept, everyone is tired of the routine of "woman, you have to listen to me" and begins to appreciate more diversified emotional relationships.

As early as two years ago, some insiders said that in the future, as long as there is a demand for love and perfection, "overlord drama" will still exist. Neither the industry nor the audience will give up the "master drama", but it must be based on the premise that the characters are full, the details are exquisite, and the dramas are constantly improving and innovating. The creator should use the more authentic The Emperor's New Clothes to satisfy the audience's fantasy and unfulfilled desire for life.

Stories are made up. People who have no life only talk about the life they enjoy. Such a play should not be broadcast.

Making film and television dramas is not perfunctory or deceptive. The audience and the market cannot and should not tolerate such works.

The audience's aesthetics are constantly changing, and so are social culture, including gender concepts. The creator is stubborn in his bizarre and exaggerated imagination and doesn't look up at the reality around him, so the picture of the fusion of fantasy and desire will be embarrassing. However, the ridicule of the play also shows that we were worried that although the cultural products they were interested in could not be "eliminated", the audience's antagonistic decoding would dissolve its meaning.