I'm thinking about whether to let my children learn programming.

Let children learn programming according to their own interests and talents.

From Luo Ji's thinking to his athletic ability, every child has his own type of intelligence. Only by analyzing what kind of intelligence a child belongs to can we tap the potential of the child and let the child grow up in "jumps" again and again. The same is true of learning programming. Whether considering natural interests, giving children the right to choose, or doing everything, "driving ducks to the shelves", the results are very different.

A meaningful life has its own attitude. Whether it's programming, math, playing the piano or writing poetry ... education is like a marathon. Parents don't have to be complacent about their children's "acceleration", and they don't have to worry about the accumulated "slow variables". Life will be more exciting if they accompany their children to find interesting points.

Extended data:

From the "Olympics fever" in the past to the "children's programming fever" now, how parents give their children the most suitable education is an eternal topic. Whether out of the idea that "more skills will not drag you down", the urgency of "expecting success" or the reality of "getting extra points for further studies", parents have "added a fire" to their children's programming.

Children's programming training industry is growing, but it is still immature. A unified industry standard and authoritative evaluation system have not yet been formed, and institutions with irregular tools and insufficient teachers are exposed from time to time. At the same time, exaggerated gimmicks such as "not knowing programming is illiteracy in the digital age" and "losing the ability to survive without writing code" are suspected of false propaganda. Paying more attention to interest than education is doomed to fail to meet the expectations of students and parents.

People's Daily-People's Daily: Children's programming craze needs cold thinking.