There is a photographer who is using the Nikon 28-300mm f3.5-5.6 lens. Please tell me what you think of this lens. Thank you very much!

I used this head when I first got the full-frame camera. In fact, the overall feeling is that it is worth the price. The key is convenience, the focal length coverage is large enough, the color is relatively clear, the resolution is OK, and the macro is a bit small. Functional, but of course the shortcomings are also natural, large distortion, reduced telephoto, and smaller aperture. As for the imaging quality, after using two or three primes, they are not on the same level at all. For me, telephoto The aspect was eventually replaced by 70-200. My personal opinion is that it is good for beginners. I often use a small aperture to shoot landscapes when traveling, but I am still not very satisfied when pursuing imaging.